<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
  <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews</id>
  <link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/atom.xml" />

  <title>Brent P. Newhall's Reviews Blog</title> 
  <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews" />
  <updated>2010-03-03T21:59:19Z</updated>
  <author> 
    <name>Brent P. Newhall</name>
  </author>

  <entry>
   <title>Gundam X</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/4-Nov-09-gundam-x.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/4-Nov-09-gundam-x.php</id>
    <updated>2009-11-04T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">4 Nov 09 - Gundam X</p>
<center><img src="http://www.mono2u.com/fileupload/images/Gundam_X/Gundam%20X8.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>Note: This is part of my attempt to review every Gundam show that I've seen, which is almost all of them.  This is a spoiler-free review, though I do describe the show's premise and villains.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>After War: Gundam X</em> was the third Gundam series set in its own timeline, and it suffered for it.  <em>G</em> found a core audience but was generally reviled by hard-line fans for being too cheesy.  <em>Wing</em> was hated for being too melodramatic (and its pilots for being "too pretty").  After that, a lot of Gundam fans just stopped caring.  So <em>X</em> suffers it ignominy of being the only Gundam show (besides the first) to be canceled partway through its run.</p>
<p>It didn't deserve that fate.  While <em>X</em> is a lighter show than, say, <em>Zeta</em> or <em>Wing</em>, it's a solidly constructed series that runs a wide range of emotions and themes.</p>
<p>Its timeline is actually closest of all alternate timelines to that of original Gundam ("Universal Century"); in fact, <em>X</em> can be seen as an alternate history version of U.C., asking what would have happened if Amuro had never appeared, and Newtype psychic development continued its rapidly escalating arms race.</p>
<img src="http://www.ex.org/1.1/images/gundamx.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>In <em>After War Gundam X</em>, 15 years have passed since this universe's version of the apocalyptic One Year War.  That conflict grew increasingly devastating, until Earth's biosphere partially collapsed, wrapping the planet in a decade-long cloud of choking dust.  While humans and most species survived, the world is now a post-apocalyptic wilderness of fierce bandits and abandoned technology amidst struggling pockets of civilization.</p>
<p>And struggling as much as anyone is Garrod Ran, the show's 15-year-old protagonist.  He's a standard mecha shonen hero:  courage and spirit to spare, but not a lot of brains.  Not to spoil anything, but in the first episode he stumbles on a Gundam, and proceeds to pilot it (big shock there), with the help of a very quiet (and, it's hinted, previously abused) girl named Tifa, who can activate an insanely destructive weapon in Garrod's Gundam.  The two quickly develop feelings for each other: Garrod wants to protect the delicate and sensitive Tifa, while Tifa appreciates the first person who's ever cared for her safety.</p>
<p>Garrod and Tifa soon join the crew of a large hovering battleship, the Frieden, and with a few other mecha pilots, they wander around helping people and running from the enigmatic and delightfully evil Frost brothers.</p>
<p>So, it's basically an action/adventure show.  It's a bit less episodic than most super robot shows (or <em>G Gundam</em>), though; the Frieden's crew soon investigates the Frost brothers' political machinations, and seek to forestall potential conflicts and wars.  Characters from previous episodes re-appear as larger foes emerge.</p>
<p>If this sounds simple, it is.  And that's part of the charm of <em>X</em>.  It avoids the over-the-top energy of <em>G</em> which puts off many fans, while following a straightforward, easily-comprehensible story.  The characters are easy to root for.  The Gundams are presented as powerful war machines.  Secrets are revealed and the stakes build.  The animation's clean, and the music's appropriately operatic.</p>
<p>It's a fun ride.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Fight! ''Mobile Fighter G Gundam''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Nov-09-fight--mobile-figh.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Nov-09-fight--mobile-figh.php</id>
    <updated>2009-11-02T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">2 Nov 09 - Fight! <em>Mobile Fighter G Gundam</em></p>
<center><img src="http://brentnewhall.com/graphics/blog/g_gundam.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<p><em>This is the latest in a series of reviews about every Gundam series that I've seen (which, at this point, is almost all of them).</em></p>
<p>My last review focused on <em>Gundam Wing</em>, but let's back up for a minute.  Before that, and after <em>Victory Gundam</em>, Sunrise decided to expand into new, "alternate universe" Gundam shows, which would preserve the core themes of Gundam but tell stories in different worlds and timelines.</p>
<p>The first attempt was <em>Mobile Fighter G Gundamm</em>, which returned to the roots of the mecha genre with an over-the-top, high-spirited show of Manly Men.</p>
<p>Which brings us to the <em>Dragonball Z</em> comparisons.  Indeed, <em>G</em> is close in spirit to <em>Dragonball Z</em>.  This strikes Gundam purists as heresy, and I understand.  I tried to watch <em>G</em> several times, but suffered from prejudice.  I was so used to the more serious--or at least convoluted--style of other Gundam shows that I just couldn't stomach a show that looked so much like a cheesy shonen series or a 1970's Go Nagai mech show.</p>
<p>Which turns out to be the key to appreciating <em>G Gundam</em>.  This is a throwback to early giant robot shows, to <em>Getter Robo</em> and <em>Mazinger</em> and <em>Voltron</em>.  The characters are mostly two-dimensional, but they're supposed to be.  They're archetypes.  They're characters in a morality play.  They exist to show us clear viewpoints and opinions.</p>
<p>And they do so in the context of the Gundam Fight, the cheesiest mecha idea ever -- giant robots descend from space colonies to Earth and bust each other up, the winner's colony winning control of Earth for the following four years.  I mean, really, <em>what</em>?</p>
<p>It works.  It works because the Gundam Fight is not the point.  This is a story of characters and morality.  Of people pushing themselves and striving to accomplish lofty goals.</p>
<p>It's a cartoon about giant robots beating the crap out of each other.</p>
<p>Relax and enjoy.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Quick Review of ''God of Manga: Osamu Tezuka''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Oct-09-quick-review-of--go.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Oct-09-quick-review-of--go.php</id>
    <updated>2009-10-29T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">29 Oct 09 - Quick Review of <em>God of Manga: Osamu Tezuka</em></p>
<p>Just finished this book, and while it's probably more appropriate for <a href="http://www.otakunovideo.net/">Otaku, No Video</a>, I wanted to gush about it here.</p>
<p><em>God of Manga</em> is a book about Osamu Tezuka, a man who basically created both modern manga (Japanese comics) and anime (Japanese animation).  There was a ton of manga before Tezuka; he established that the artform could tell stories appropriate for a wide range of ages.  He then took his most popular creation and made a TV animation, <em>Astro Boy</em>, which defined a great deal of the anime's eventual look-and-feel.</p>
<p><em>God of Manga</em> is 3 things, really:</p>
<ul>
<li> A biography of Tezuka</li>
<li> An analysis of Tezuka's works, including common themes</li>
<li> An overview of the manga field throughout Tezuka's life</li>
</ul>
<p>Tons of great insights, particularly involving Tezuka's "Star System" and repeated gags.  The man was an absolute genius, and this is a great testament to his abilities and influence.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Shop Class as Soulcraft''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Oct-09--shop-class-as-soul.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Oct-09--shop-class-as-soul.php</id>
    <updated>2009-10-20T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">20 Oct 09 - <em>Shop Class as Soulcraft</em></p>
<img src="http://andersonlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/shop-class-as-soulcraft.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p><em>Shop Class as Soulcraft</em> is an important book.</p>
<p>It has flaws--significant flaws--but Matthew Crawford's overall themes deserve wide attention.</p>
<p><em>Shop Class as Soulcraft</em> concerns itself with the dignity of manual labor.  It makes a case for the importance of work that repairs and maintains our world, from plumbing to car repair.  It defends the kind of knowledge gained through practical experience and apprenticeship, compared to that learned through rote memorization and following "idiot-proof" processes.</p>
<p>This leads to my main beef with the book: he glorifies practical experience and blue-collar work as inherently superior to other kinds.  I had moments where I had to put down the book and walk away, I was so frustrated by his insistence that white collar work is inherently inferior to blue collar.</p>
<p>They're important in different ways.</p>
<p>But Crawford's voice needs to be heard.  Well worth a read.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Making Things Talk</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/15-Sep-09-making-things-talk.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/15-Sep-09-making-things-talk.php</id>
    <updated>2009-09-15T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">15 Sep 09 - Making Things Talk</p>
<img src="http://www.elug.ca/reviews/making_things_talk.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p><em><a href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596510510/">Making Things Talk</a></em> is intended for a specific audience, but one which I wish were bigger.  It's aimed at folks who want to wire up stuff.</p>
<p>Stuff like motion-sensing stuffed animals.  A doorbell that chimes every time someone visits your website.  Real-world, physical objects.</p>
<p>But without all the hassles of soldering.</p>
<p>Enter <em>Making Things Talk</em> and the Arduino module, which you can plug into any computer with a USB port and program using a simple language.  The book--written very well by O'Reilly--explains how.</p>
<p>If the above description fired off an idea or two for something you've Always Wanted To Make, this is the book for you.  It starts at the very basics, assuming you're intelligent but uneducated about electricity, electronics, <em>etc</em>.</p>
<p>You'll need to spend a fair amount of time fiddling with small parts, of course, and a bit of basic equipment.  Which is why I bought <em>Making Things Talk</em> as part of the <a href="http://www.makershed.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=MSAPK2">Advanced Arduino Starter Kit</a> (US $115), which comes with most of that basic equipment.</p>
<p>If you're willing to put in the time, you may find this to be a fun hobby--one that I've only begun to scratch the surface of--which provides a satisfying sense of accomplishment.  At the end, you have something you can literally carry around and show off to your friends.</p>
<p>And there's a lot to be said for controlling and inventing your environment.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''How To Cook''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Sep-09--how-to-cook-.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Sep-09--how-to-cook-.php</id>
    <updated>2009-09-01T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">1 Sep 09 - <em>How To Cook</em></p>
<img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/P/0789471868.01.SCMZZZZZZZ_SS100.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I am a minimalist.</p>
<p>This is especially so in the kitchen.  I haven't bought a new pot, pan, or kitchen utensil in 5 years.  I just don't need to.  I know the basics.</p>
<p>I have a slightly more eclectic approach to cookbooks.  I believe in learning how to cook things <em>in general</em>.  I don't follow an omelette recipe; I know how to make omelettes, and will incorporate whatever ingredients are handy and/or interesting to me in the moment.</p>
<p>As such, I recommend cooks buy <em>The Joy of Cooking</em>, and concentrate on that for their first few years.</p>
<p>But.  An unusual cookbook can inspire the cook, and introduce an unexpected flavor or texture combination.  A treasured few can do that, while beautifully illustrating methods of cooking that may be a bit too briefly covered in the venerable <em>Joy of Cooking</em>.</p>
<p>Such is the case with Delia Smith's <em>How To Cook</em>.  I confess that I stumbled on this large hardback in a nearby cafe-cum-bookstore, just after sampling a deliriously delicious coconut cake.  As luck would have it, this book had a recipe for just such a cake, and even better, it was on sale.  So I bought it.</p>
<p>It's a lovely BBC production, a companion to a TV series, and the pages are laid out in an admirably clear, downright artful structure.  It really shows you how to make an omelette, and roast a chicken, and prepare fish, and many other common kitchen projects, in addition to its many recipes (all lovingly photographed).</p>
<p>I'm trying not to lead up to a "you should buy this" finale.  Does everyone need this book?  Of course not.  But it is beautiful and useful.</p>
<p>And of how many things in life can one say that?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Giving Up on ''Three Hearts and Three Lions''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-Aug-09-giving-up-on--three.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-Aug-09-giving-up-on--three.php</id>
    <updated>2009-08-28T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">28 Aug 09 - Giving Up on <em>Three Hearts and Three Lions</em></p>
<img src="http://ofearna.us/art/giancola/threeheartsthreelions.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>A friend of mine recommended this Poul Anderson fantasy novel, <em>Three Hearts and Three Lions</em> a while back.  I've finally been working my way through it.</p>
<p>I'm not going to finish it.</p>
<p>It's about a guy who wakes up in a fantasy world, and can mysteriously speak the language and ride a horse and fight (quite well!) in armor.  And he's trying to figure out how he got here, and why.  So he's talked to a nearby witch, who's directed him to the nearest elven lord for advice.  He's attracted a dwarf and a shapeshifting girl as companions.</p>
<p>That's it.  I'm <strong>1/3 of the way through</strong> the book, and that's as far as we've gotten.</p>
<p>I don't mean to be impatient, but at some point this ceases to be worth my time.  There's some fine writing, and some fine sequences, but the story's dull as dirt.  The characters are fun, but none have much stake in anything.</p>
<p>Worse, this is not a <em>bland</em> novel.  Anderson was a strong writer, and this world comes alive at times.  I find his use of phonetic dialect frustrating (I kid you not, this is an exact quote: <em>"'Tis naw so canny a steadin' ye're boon fawr."</em>), but it does add richness to his characters.  And the protagonist was a smart engineer in his past life, so he's constantly evaluating his surroundings to figure out the scientific implications (<em>"He wondered what they used in place of steel. Aluminum alloys? Surely magic could extract aluminum from bauxite.  Beryllium, magnesium, copper, nickel, chrominum, manganese--while doubltless correct, the idea of an elvish wizard with a spectroscope was funny enough to restore a balance in Holger."</em>).</p>
<p>But, ultimately, the book feels like <strong>no more than a neat idea and a richly-imagined medieval world</strong>.  And I'm sorry, but I need a little more out of that in my novels right now.</p>
<p>(Writers:  Does this describe your novel?  What could you do to give the characters a more pressing problem to deal with?)</p>
<p>So, this one <strong>goes back on the shelves</strong>.  A pity; I loved Anderson's <em>The High Crusade</em>.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Never Let Me Go''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Aug-09--never-let-me-go-.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Aug-09--never-let-me-go-.php</id>
    <updated>2009-08-24T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">24 Aug 09 - <em>Never Let Me Go</em></p>
<img src="http://inception-magazine.com/zine/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/neverletmego.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>It's difficult to <strong>review Kazuo Ishiguro's <em>Never Let Me Go</em> </strong>without resorting to reviewers' favorite candy phrases: <em>heart-wrenching</em>, <em>melancholy</em>, <em>tragic</em>, and the one that I always shudder at, <em>tour de force</em>.</p>
<p>This is partly because of its deceit.  For its first few chapters, it appears to be nothing more than a woman reminiscing about her childhood at an English boarding school.  Moreover, the protagonist is nothing special, and spends much of her time second-guessing her (and others') actions.</p>
<p>Then you begin to notice that something's a little...off.  Certain life details are conspicuously absent.  Some normal things are never mentioned, while others are referenced in strange ways, and there are these strange euphemisms about <em>donations</em> and <em>completing</em>.</p>
<p>These are the two great strengths of Ishiguro's novel:</p>
<ol>
<li> The writing is <strong>delicately structured</strong> to intrigue and reveal, despite a narrator who is rather dull herself.  One learns things about characters that the characters don't realize themselves.</li>
<li> There's a <strong>twist</strong> to this woman's life and entire world that's revealed slowly and naturally (another of Ishiguro's impressive feats), and which adds several complex layers of meaning to her memories and worries.  This drives the story forward even further.</li>
</ol>
<p>Which makes <em>Never Let Me Go</em> even more difficult to review.  Ishiguro's subtle touch masks wonderful layers of intriguing complexity, and the twist really shouldn't be revealed in a review like this.  So what can I say?</p>
<p>After I finished the final page, I felt like my head had blossomed open like a flower, and I felt dazed for a few hours.</p>
<p>I can hardly think of higher praise.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>The Girl Who Leapt Through Time</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Jul-09-the-girl-who-leapt-t.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Jul-09-the-girl-who-leapt-t.php</id>
    <updated>2009-07-01T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">1 Jul 09 - The Girl Who Leapt Through Time</p>
<img src="http://217.205.197.220/borders-media/EntCoverThumbnail/5022366507943/the-girl-who-leapt-through-time.jpg?w=160&amp;h=200" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>If you're looking for a fun, touching summer movie, you can't go wrong with <em>The Girl Who Leapt Through Time</em>.</p>
<p>It's an anime film released two years ago, centering around a Japanese high school girl with two male friends, and the surprising summer she has as she stumbles upon an ability to (duh) jump through time.</p>
<p>It's a high-quality production throughout.  The animation's fluid, characters are drawn consistently and realistically, the music fits, and the voices work well.</p>
<p>Even better, it avoids anime cliches.  This is a light-hearted film that just happens to be animated.</p>
<p>It's a perfect summer flick; fun, light, airy, but with just enough melodrama to remind one of lazy teen summers and the fleeting hearts of youth.</p>
<p>(Okay, I blush at the cheesiness of that last phrase.  But it fits, somehow.)</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>What's to Love about ''Gundam Wing''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Jun-09-what-s-to-love-about.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Jun-09-what-s-to-love-about.php</id>
    <updated>2009-06-30T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">30 Jun 09 - What's to Love about <em>Gundam Wing</em></p>
<center><img src="http://auanime.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/gundam_wing.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>Note: I've skipped two shows.  After </em>ZZ Gundam<em> came </em>Victory Gundam<em>, which I'm less than a quarter of the way into.  Gundam's overall popularity waned when the ultra-depressing </em>Victory<em> was released, so toy company Bandai (a long-time commercial collaborator with Sunrise) bought out Sunrise and suggested new Gundam series set in separate universes.  That resulted in </em>G Gundam<em>, which likewise I'm about a quarter of the way into.  So I'm skipping ahead to the series after that: </em>New Mobile Report Gundam Wing<em>.</em></p>
<p><em>This is a spoiler-free review, as I won't even attempt to describe the show's plot.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<img src="http://epguides.com/GundamWing/cast.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I cannot review this show objectively.</p>
<p>No review is ever truly objective, of course, but one can at least hold most shows to some kind of standards, and see what most would enjoy.</p>
<p>The reason for my subjectivity began with the Midnight Run on Toonami.  They'd show uncut episodes of <em>Gundam Wing</em> and <em><a href="http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Dragon_Ball_Z">Dragonball Z</a></em> from midnight to one in the morning every weeknight.  It's an odd time to watch an action show; the house is quiet and still while brightly-colored people scream and gun each other down on the flickering TV screen.</p>
<p>I'd watch Midnight Run in my room, running an IM conversation with <a href="http://www.saalonmuyo.com/">Saalon</a> (and occasionally <a href="http://p1k3.com/">Brennen</a>) while watching.  Unfortunately, the computer screen was directly opposite the TV, so I kept whipping my head around to catch action on the TV or a message from Saalon.</p>
<p>We came in about halfway into <em>Gundam Wing</em> (and a few episodes into <em>DBZ</em>'s <a href="http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Frieza_Saga">Frieza Saga</a>).  We had no idea what was going on.  We couldn't keep track of the pilots.  Characters seemed to switch sides every episode.  The mecha fights often re-used the same movement and explosion animation.</p>
<p>And yet, Saalon and I fell completely, head-over-heels in love with the show.  We loved the complexity of the storyline.  We loved the intensity of the characters.  The Gundams looked cool.</p>
<p>We later re-watched the show, finally understood what the heck was going on, and we loved it <em>even more</em>.  I'm sure <em>Wing</em> has all sorts of flaws, but I literally can't see many of them because when I watch the show I instantly enjoy myself.</p>
<p>So, with that little ego boost out of the way, what exactly is <em>Gundam Wing</em>?</p>
<img src="http://www.5inall.com/gundam/gimages/wing.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>It's a politically complicated show about terrorists sent from space colonies to soften up the Earth's militaries, in preparation for the colonies declaring independence.  Each colony sends its own pilot, under separate orders, so the pilots don't necessarily know (or even like) each other, despite working for the same overall goal.  Indeed, the pilots often come into conflict with each other.  A few of the pilots are certifiable nutjobs.</p>
<p>As the story progresses, the pilots begin to question their goals and develop more complex opinions of the growing conflict.  And some of them go even <em>more</em> nuts.</p>
<p><em>Gundam Wing</em> marked the second Gundam series told in its own timeline, after the intentionally cheesy <em>G Gundam</em>.  <em>Wing</em> returned to a somewhat more serious tone for the franchise, though <em>Wing</em> is cheesy in its own way.  Whereas <em>G</em> is cheesy like a 70's super robot show, <em>Wing</em> is cheesy like an overly-serious opera.</p>
<p>The show is arguably the most politically complicated show I've ever seen.  Alliances are made and collapse, characters switch sides; if you miss an episode or two you can be completely lost upon returning to the show to discover that one character's dead, another's fighting for a completely different group, and heck a new political alliance has formed.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the five main pilots are themselves the least politically motivated.  They're given orders, which they (initially) carry out completely and without question.  It's the folks around them that are constantly jockeying for advantage or the betterment of mankind, and trying to maneuver the pilots into acting for or against their own interests.  It's a revealing moment when, fairly early into the show, the viewer realizes that one pilot's actions play completely into the plans of one of the villains, neatly accomplishing the villain's goal.  That's the kind of show it is.</p>
<p>Every character has a distinctive personality.  When reviewing <em>Baccano!</em> for <a href="http://www.otakunovideo.net">Otaku, No Video</a>, I described the characters as having "bold" personalities.  I can think of no better adjective for the characters in <em>Wing</em>, though the boldness is more a melodramatic intensity and distinctiveness.  There are very few shy, retiring characters here.</p>
<p>Opera is actually an apt comparison.  <em>Wing</em> is big, brassy, over-the-top, and melodramatic in tackling an epic story with memorable (and often insane) characters.  You have to accept it for what it is, and when you do, you'd better strap yourself in for a heck of a ride.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Change The Way You Read</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Jun-09-change-the-way-you-r.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Jun-09-change-the-way-you-r.php</id>
    <updated>2009-06-29T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">29 Jun 09 - Change The Way You Read</p>
<img src="http://www.drscavanaugh.org/ebooks/ebook_readers/kindledx.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Forgot to mention:  <strong>I have a Kindle DX</strong>.</p>
<p>Not sure how to describe it, as I'm not sure how much you all know about Kindles.  Where to start?</p>
<p>The Kindle is Amazon's electronic book reader.  The DX is <strong>the latest</strong> in their line, and larger than the previous Kindle 1 and Kindle 2.  The screen's 9.7 inches along the diagonal, compared to earlier Kindles' 6-inch screens.  So <strong>the DX is more like a hardback</strong> book, while the others are more like paperbacks.</p>
<p>Which is not an unqualified difference.  The K2 is a tad lighter, and thus a little easier to hold, but has a smaller screen.</p>
<p>Basic functionality:  you read books on it (duh!).  There's a Sprint cell modem on it, so anywhere one can get a Sprint signal, one can access Amazon's e-book store and buy more books.  E-book prices are averaging $5 to $10 each at the moment.</p>
<p>While my initial interest in the Kindle cooled after six months, it's ramped back up since then.  And not just because of the DX.  About nine months in, I found myself reading more than before.  It's just so convenient to always have a book with you, which can always become <em>any</em> book.  Or magazine or newspaper (the selection grows).  The DX makes the whole experience more pleasant, as magazines and newspapers just fit onto it better.</p>
<p>I use it constantly, and for a bibliophile, what better endorsement is there?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Internet Comedy That Doesn't Suck?</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/18-Jun-08-internet-comedy-that.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/18-Jun-08-internet-comedy-that.php</id>
    <updated>2008-06-18T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">18 Jun 08 - Internet Comedy That Doesn't Suck?</p>
<img src="http://brentnewhall.com/graphics/blog/lrr.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Every time I try to write about <a href="http://www.loadingreadyrun.com/">Loading Ready Run</a>, I end up with a dry essay.  Which is the antithesis of Loading Ready Run.</p>
<p>LRR is an <strong>online comedy team</strong>.  Which immediately conjures up images of college-age guys making cheap videos and desperately trying to be funny; folks who see Saturday Night Live and think, "That's easy!"</p>
<p>Ironically, LRR's videos <em>are</em> cheap, but <strong>they're also <em>funny</em>.</strong>  Some of them are absolutely perfect; I've re-watched <a href="http://loadingreadyrun.com/videos/view/214/its-very-simple">It's Very Simple</a> and <a href="http://loadingreadyrun.com/videos/view/228/Halo-The-Future-of-Gaming">Halo: The Future of Combat</a> many times and am consistently floored at how well they're executed.</p>
<p>LRR's got about a dozen regular cast members, and about that many more occasional contributors.  They post a new video every week, almost always a sketch a few minutes long.  They have a few themes that they occasionally return to, but those rarely amount to more than three videos.</p>
<p>Then they did something interesting.</p>
<p>After posting videos every week for years, they felt a need to grow.  So <strong>they created "Commodore Hustle."</strong></p>
<p>How to describe this?  Okay, in creating several hundred short comedy videos, the cast members inevitably made videos in which they played, essentially, themselves.  But just as inevitably, they were playing dramatized versions of themselves.  Pushed to extremes.  In reality, Paul isn't quite as single-mindedly geeky as the "Paul" you see in videos.</p>
<p>So they decided to create an ongoing video series starring these dramatized versions of themselves.  They're essentially making a movie, in 15-minute segments of inter-related sketches about themselves working on their videos and generally dealing with life.</p>
<p>Which was fine and funny for the first few segments.  Some of it's bizarre, some of it well-written, some relies on editing.</p>
<p>Then around about episode 5, it got really interesting.  They developed a villain--who plays his role perfectly--as a frustrated comedy writer who works at a video store and wants to Take Them Down.  It's evolving into a serial, really, something that I look forward to watching more of.</p>
<p>And they keep posting their regular videos every week, too, so they keep fresh with that.</p>
<p>Awesome to see folks build and develop their skills, and grow into creating something remarkable.  They're an inspiration.</p>
<p>(Warning:  I haven't been watching LRR recently, so likely they've finished Commodore Hustle or gone in a completely new direction or summat.)</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Why ''ZZ Gundam'' Might Be Worth Watching, Maybe</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/4-Jun-09-why--zz-gundam--mi.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/4-Jun-09-why--zz-gundam--mi.php</id>
    <updated>2009-06-04T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">4 Jun 09 - Why <em>ZZ Gundam</em> Might Be Worth Watching, Maybe</p>
<center><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51BW8MYCKBL.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>Spoilers are hardest in this review.  My enjoyment of this show hinges on several characters and plot points that reference the previous show.  So, the first part of this review has no spoilers, and the last half will be clearly marked as spoiler territory so I can explain my love.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I've enjoyed every Gundam series I've seen.  Each is fun in its own way, of course; Gundam spans a surprising variety of philosophies and tones.</p>
<p>While I enjoyed <em>ZZ Gundam</em>, it's the most difficult for me to recommend.    It doesn't fit traditional categories of worth or enjoyment.  It starts out lighthearted, more in the vein of an adventure show for tweens.  The protagonists exhibit minimal angst or emotional problems; they basically go on weird adventures for the first half-dozen episodes.  Then, halfway through, the show delivers possibly my favorite episode in Gundam; it gets serious and dramatic and downright <em>painful</em>, which the show returns to frequently throughout its second half.</p>
<p>But that's not to say that <em>ZZ Gundam</em> starts goofy and turns serious.  It's a trend.  It's fun throughout; there are just more serious moments in the latter half.</p>
<img src="http://www.mahq.net/animation/gundam/zz/ep3a.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I also have trouble recommending this show because of the villains.  They're just completely flat and uninteresting.  From a stale rip-off of Char Aznable (supposedly, this character was supposed to be Char, but Tomino got a green light on his later <em>Char's Counterattack</em> movie as he wrote <em>ZZ</em>, so he substituted this character for Char), to a spastic woman wearing dominatrix gear who occasionally flashes her breasts at the audience, to the sadly one-note presence of Haman Khan, the various Neo-Zeon antagonists never appear threatening.</p>
<p>The show begins literally hours after the final moments of <em>Zeta Gundam</em>.  The main ship limps into port at Side 1, and gets involved with a group of rough-and-tumble teens, who become the protagonists of the show.</p>
<p>And it is odd.  We basically watch these kids stumble around for a good chunk of the show.  They're no big fans of the Federation.  The central pilot, Judau, is a typical passionate shonen teen, full of bravado.  His friends are also similar shonen characters.  In fact, not long into the show, Judau's sister falls into the hands of Neo-Zeon, and I think this was the only way to keep Judau and the others fighting.</p>
<p><strong>SPOILER WARNING</strong></p>
<p>Then, halfway through the show, Judau finally re-unites with his kidnapped sister.  Briefly.</p>
<p>He finds his way into a Neo-Zeon stronghold and grabs his kidnapped sister.  Guards open fire, and a shot hits his sister in her side.  They escape, Judau hiding his sister in a nearby hut while he returns to his Gundam to fight off the Neo Zeon forces chasing them.  Judau then takes out a mecha which crashes directly on his sister's hut, which explodes in fire and metal scrap.  Judau lands, unable to believe she's dead, and paws through the wreckage while the ten-year-old girl he rescued earlier drags at his arm, crying, "I'll be your little sister from now on."  At which point he turns and slaps her across the face.  And she collapes in a crying heap.</p>
<p>It's an episode of pain and pathos.  Perfectly done.  It works.</p>
<img src="http://www.mahq.net/animation/gundam/zz/zzmain.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Which is a relief because <em>ZZ</em> is a mess.  It's a jumble of drama and comedy, of laughable villains and stock protagonists.  But when it starts to fire on all cylinders, it barrels along with an intensity rarely matched in any other Gundam show before the turn of the millenium.</p>
<p>One of my favorite aspects of this comes in the form of Kamille Bidan, the protagonist of <em>Zeta Gundam</em>.  He appears in <em>ZZ</em>, still a shattered, catatonic shell after the events of <em>Zeta</em>.  In an episode about two thirds of the way through <em>ZZ</em>, the characters end up in the same city where he's recovering in the hospital.  He now shifts uncomfortably in his coma.</p>
<p>During an episode involving at least four Newtypes (people who've developed mild psychic powers), Kamille leaps to his feet and runs from the hospital, still incoherent and unable to recognize even his girlfriend.  He flees down the coast to observe the battle which he can clearly sense.</p>
<p>The battle rages on, the pilots fighting on multiple fronts, separated and searching for one another.  Suddenly, a voice speaks in their heads, calmly informing them of each others' whereabouts and situations.  We cut down to the beach, and Kamille sits there, staring at the flickering lights of battle overhead.  You know he was the one speaking.  You know he's okay, somewhere in his head.</p>
<p>Especially after the emotionally exhausting end of <em>Zeta</em>, to see that Kamille is on the mend and would be okay is a huge relief.</p>
<p>An odd thing to mention, perhaps, in a review of <em>ZZ</em>--the treatment of a character from a different show.  But it shows just how sensitive Tomino is to his characters and his audience.  He knows who we care about.  Of course, it also says something about how little I ended up being emotionally involved in the actual protagonists of <em>ZZ</em>.</p>
<p>And the characters are what make <em>ZZ</em> work, in the end.  There's a big battle at the end, of course, and despite the muddy execution, I felt <em>good</em> about who fought whom, and who won.  It also has possibly my favorite death in Gundam, mainly because of the poetic justice of it all.  Again, this is Tomino knowing how to treat his characters right.</p>
<p>Overall?  The show is as muddy as this review.  There are plenty of things to dislike about it.  But, despite that, I enjoyed <em>ZZ</em>, I'm glad I watched it, and I wouldn't mind watching it again.  There's some good stuff here.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Has ''Star Trek'' Lost Its Way?</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-May-09-has--star-trek--lo.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-May-09-has--star-trek--lo.php</id>
    <updated>2009-05-27T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">27 May 09 - Has <em>Star Trek</em> Lost Its Way?</p>
<p>As I mention in this YouTube review, I had a grand time watching <strong>the new <em>Star Trek</em> movie</strong>.  Afterwards, I started thinking about it, and I had second thoughts.</p>
<![CDATA[<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLafP20N36I&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLafP20N36I&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>]]>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Why ''Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam'' Is Worth Watching</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/14-May-09-why--mobile-suit-ze.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/14-May-09-why--mobile-suit-ze.php</id>
    <updated>2009-05-14T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">14 May 09 - Why <em>Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam</em> Is Worth Watching</p>
<center><img src="http://otakusurf.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/aazetacaptionpic1a.JPG" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>Note: This is the second in my series of articles on each show in the Gundam franchise.  I don't have a specific schedule for this; I'm just writing these reviews as I feel like it.  The last one was <a href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Apr-09-why-you-should-watch.php">Why You Should Watch Mobile Suit Gundam</a>.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Four years after the broadcast of the original <em>Mobile Suit Gundam</em> (which was not particularly popular during its broadcast), and the increasing popularity thereof thanks to the three movie compilations released afterwards, Sunrise produced <em>Zeta Gundam</em>.  It's set 7 years after the end of <em>Mobile Suit Gundam</em>, and introduces a mostly new cast of characters and giant robots.  The One Year War is over, and heroes must rise to face new problems.</p>
<p>And the cast of <em>Zeta</em> is one of its best aspects.  Nearly every character has a role to play, in illustrating an ideal or pushing another character in some important direction.  And this with a very large cast of several dozen characters.</p>
<p>Whereas <em>MSG</em> takes place during the final months of the One Year War between Earth and Zeon, <em>Zeta</em>'s primary conflict is a guerilla war.  The Earth Federation military has been taken over by a ruthless, Nazi-like military faction called the Titans, which the protagonists are fighting to stop.</p>
<p>This is a bit of a problem, actually.  <em>Zeta</em> doesn't have quite as tight of a narrative drive as <em>Mobile Suit Gundam</em> did.  In the earlier show, the overall state of the war helped to drive the plot of the story, and often directed the characters' next actions.  Because <em>Zeta</em> concerns itself with a series of small military skirmishes, its plot doesn't feel like it's building to a big story climax.  While there is <em>very much</em> a big climax, the overall guerilla war--though it escalates--doesn't hold together the way a large war with major military offensives does.</p>
<img src="http://www.robot-japan.com/gundam-robot/gundam/z/images/zeta_gundam.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>As a result, <em>Zeta</em> spends more time on character moments.  When I think about <em>Zeta</em>, I think about conversations between characters as much as I remember cool mecha action.  This show contrasts its characters, and isn't afraid to present characters with whom we only sympathize some of the time.  Kamille, the protagonist, is a fascinating study in light and dark:  he's impetuous and vain, but absolutely dedicated to ideals of justice.  While Amuro spends most of <em>MSG</em> agonizing over his choice of being a pilot, Kamille makes his peace with that choice early on.</p>
<p>A few other characters show up, and this is another example of Zeta's strengths and weaknesses.  Char works with the "good guys" now, which is awesome; we get to spend more time with a complex character who has multiple allegiances.  But he's now merely an excellent pilot, as opposed to being unquestionably the best pilot alive as he was in <em>MSG</em>.  Sure, he's in hiding and doesn't want to show off, but those skills would inevitably appear during life-or-death combat.</p>
<p>So it goes with the re-introduction of Amuro, who joins the cast for a while.  He's still a shockingly good pilot, but he suddenly can't make the kinds of kills he could seven years ago.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Amuro's a great example of the strength of the characters.  Amuro is world-weary, angry at the Earth Federation, and still uneasy in his relationships.  He's an adult, no longer unsure of himself, but still plagued by many of the same emotional problems.  It's a fantastic update to the character (much like, say, Luke Skywalker in <em>Return of the Jedi</em>).</p>
<p>This presages the much <strong>darker tone</strong> of <em>Zeta</em>.  It seems like a solid, more complex sequel to <em>MSG</em>, until about six episodes from the end.  Then characters start to die.  I won't tell you who or how many, but suffice to say by the end a lot of characters have gone on to the Great Dip In The Sky.</p>
<p>And it wraps up with perhaps <strong>the most nihilistic ending</strong> I've ever seen in anime.  I've seen some really dark endings, but usually there's a ray of hope.  <em>Evangelion</em> and <em>Ideon</em> end with quite a bit of hope for the future (well, the final <em>Ideon</em> movie, at least), and even Akira ends with a certain kind of life asserting itself.  <em>Zeta</em> ends, er, very much on a downer.</p>
<p>Which explains my initial reaction to the series: tepid appreciation.  I felt like it had some great animation and some neat character moments, but that it was just muddled and ended on such a downer.</p>
<p>Until I let time pass.</p>
<p>The more I thought about <em>Zeta</em>, and the more I analyzed its relationships and characters, the more I appreciated it.  I realized that the arrogant characters were <em>supposed</em> to be arrogant, and the cold ones were <em>meant</em> to be cold.  They were all pushing each other in different directions.</p>
<p><em>Zeta</em> is a morality play.  The action's cool, but ultimately it's about a bunch of flawed humans, doing their best to stop injustice.</p>
<p>A good example:  one running gag in the franchise is the word "ikimasu."  It means "Here I go," and it's what Amuro yells in <em>MSG</em> whenever he launches in his Gundam.  There are many different phrases one could use to announce that one is going out; that's just the one Amuro tended to use.  It's become a standard part of Gundam that, whenever the protagonist steps into the role of hero, he starts to use "ikimasu" when launching.</p>
<img src="http://www.animeuknews.net/img/uploaded/112302275862.253.128.13.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Late in <em>Zeta</em>, one of the characters dies in Kamille's arms.  It's in the middle of a larger conflict, while they're inside a large structure that's about to explode, so Kamille reluctantly has to leave her there.  She asks him to finish what they started, and he agrees.  She breathes her last, and he stands up, walks to the door, then turns and softly murmurs, "Kamille Bidan.  Ikimasu."</p>
<p>It's a beautiful moment, perfectly representing the kind of writing that <em>Zeta</em> achieves on a fairly regular basis.</p>
<p>One other side note:  <em>Zeta</em> is amazingly well-animated.  It came out 2 years after <em>Super Dimensional Fortress Macross</em>, which established that anime could be well-animated, and they took that lesson to heart.</p>
<p>For example, when the mecha are maneuvering in space, they have several dozen tiny "Vernier thrusters" all over the frame.  The animators actually draw each individual thruster blast as the mecha twist and turn during combat.  That's the kind of detail you get in this show.</p>
<p>So it looks good, and it has complex characters.  And it ages like a fine wine.  Sure, it has stretches of bland writing and less-than-stellar animation.  But overall, it's a remarkable achievement in the Gundam franchise.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Why You Should Watch ''Mobile Suit Gundam''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Apr-09-why-you-should-watch.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Apr-09-why-you-should-watch.php</id>
    <updated>2009-04-30T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">30 Apr 09 - Why You Should Watch <em>Mobile Suit Gundam</em></p>
<center><img src="http://mechafans.com/upload/gundams.jpeg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>This is intended to be the first of a multi-part series where I write about each major animated work in the Gundam universe.  I want people to know what each of these shows has to offer.</em></p>
<p><em>About spoilers:  I won't tell you who dies, but this is a review of a 30-year-old show, for Pete's sake.  Anything I write about here has long since been analyzed frame-by-frame on <a href="http://2ch.net/">2ch</a>.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<img src="http://cdn.getfansub.com/upload/MSGundamMovie2.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p><em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Suit_Gundam">Mobile Suit Gundam</a></em>, of course, is where it all began.  The first Gundam show, which aired in 1979.</p>
<p>And that is the key aspect in appreciating this series.  <em>Mobile Suit Gundam</em> (<em>MSG</em>) must be understood in its historical context.  Before <em>MSG</em>, anime was aimed squarely at pre-teens and tweens.  There was <em>no anime</em> aimed at teens or adults, except maybe Go Nagai's cheesy giant robot shows, depending on how you squint at them.</p>
<p><em>Mobile Suit Gundam</em> was aimed at mid-teens, as evidenced by its 15-year-old protagonist (in most anime series, the protagonist is the same age as the target viewer).  Heck, the only characters younger than that are the comic relief orphan children.</p>
<p>(Only in Gundam do you have comic relief orphan children.)</p>
<p><em>MSG</em> also strove for realism.  In previous mecha series, the titular giant robots almost always had ridiculous backstories--designed and built by a single scientist, usually.  Transformation sequences often made no sense; the vehicles that made up <em>Getter Robo</em> melt together to form the giant robot.</p>
<p>Not so in <em>MSG</em>.  There's certainly a magic technology--there has to be for giant robots to be practical--but it's placed on a different level, behind that of the giant robots.  <em>MSG</em> introduced Minovsky particles, an otherwise undiscovered element that makes compact fusion drives possible and jams radar.  This makes hand-to-hand combat critical, especially for large vehicles.  And when one side adapted the arm-and-torso construction machines originally used for colony construction into fearsome humanoid war machines, they suddenly found themselves with an ideal war technology for space combat.</p>
<p>(Think about it:  You need huge construction equipment to build something as big as a space colony.  The construction equipment needs to be highly flexible and powerful.  What sort of controls do you put on a highly complex piece of equipment like that?  You make it as humanoid as possible, since people can more easily map controls to human movements.)</p>
<p>This is what you get in great science fiction--the magic technology suggests technological innovations and historical responses.</p>
<p>The two sides of <em>MSG</em>'s conflict also stand out.  The Earth Federation--the "good guys"--is simply Earth's government.  It's not particularly noble or just; in fact, it's portrayed as bureaucratic and behind the times of modern warfare.  The Principality of Zeon--the "bad guys"--objected to Earth's control of a fundamentally new civilization in space, and declared independence.  Not only are several Zeon characters sympathetic and noble, one of them became one of the most popular anime characters of all time, Char Aznable<sup>1</sup>.</p>
<p>Side note:  Most folks see the Nazi-style uniforms of Zeon and read that Gundam's creator, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshiyuki_Tomino">Yoshiyuki Tomino</a>, wanted <em>MSG</em> to feel like the German offensive in World War II, and call Zeon simple stand-ins for Nazis.  <a href="http://www.saalonmuyo.com/">Saalon</a> and I disagree.  Zeon is much more similar to Japan in WW2; motivated by a zeal for independence against an economic powerhouse that they see as oppressive.  While I'm sure Tomino originally intended Zeon to be like the Germans, I think he ended up creating Japanese.  While the upper-level Zeon nobility are clearly power-mad, most of the other Zeon characters are portrayed as soldiers doing what they think is right.<sup>2</sup></p>
<img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_naGX0Di40Bs/RZD2ZxE8uJI/AAAAAAAABRg/MTnWWhwpZe4/s400/gundam-0079.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Characters, too, elevate <em>MSG</em> above other anime of the time.  I can list four main characters who behave significantly differently by the end of the series.  And others explicitly don't change, to their detriment.  I can't think of any other anime with that much character change.</p>
<p>And those characters!  A few highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li> Ramba Ral is a fat Zeon military genius who travels <em>with his wife</em>, leading his men into ridiculously dangerous battles in one of Earth's backwaters.  Because he's crazy like a fox; he knows that extreme daring inspires soldiers and throws the enemy off-balance.  The sequence where he assaults White Base, corridor by corridor, presages <em>Evangelion</em>'s assault on NERV HQ by fifteen years.</li>
<li> Garma Zabi is a driven royal teenager who's been assigned an extremely safe area to hold, and desperately strives to prove himself.  I felt bad for this proud, driven teenager, who could just sit back and enjoy the good life but insisted on doing something with his life, and suffered for it.</li>
<li> Then there's Char Aznable:  Charming, handsome, mysterious, an incredible pilot, and extremely successful.  Then he kills one of his friends, and bursts out in triumphant laughter.</li>
</ul>
<p>How can you <em>not</em> be intrigued by these people?</p>
<p><em>MSG</em> accomplishes so much, especially in 43 episodes in an era when most anime had the barest thread of a story arc over the course of 50-odd episodes.  Characters evolve (and some die), technology changes, and the war builds up to a fever pitch.  Heck, the unexpected early cancellation of the series <em>helped</em> it, as the show focused on its end game for the last six episodes, and drove straight for it at full speed.</p>
<p>I distinctly remember watching a sequence about two-thirds through the show, in which the narrator explains the current Federation offensive against a major Zeon supply base.  There's a shot of White Base, followed by a shot of General Revil debating strategy options.  I suddenly realized:  I understand the overall course of the war, <em>and</em> the characters' exact strategic role in that war, <em>and</em> I know what the characters are going through (and they're going through a lot).  I've seen this show only once (plus the recap movies), and I just turned to one side and rattled off the names of fifteen major characters.  I know them that well.  I literally can't think of any other anime that accomplishes this much; even later Gundam series sacrifice one of these levels of detail.</p>
<p>Downsides?  In 1979, the Japanese still hadn't wrapped their heads (or their drawing hands) around fluid 2D animation.  <em>MSG</em> can be painful to watch, unless you've seen a lot of Hanna-Barbera cartoons.</p>
<p>It's also uneven.  Tomino felt compelled to include a mobile suit fight in every episode, and at times they feel unnecessary.</p>
<p>But it's worth it.  Oh, it's worth it, if just for the experience of this futuristic war story, and the great characters you'll meet, and the choices they face.</p>
<p><sup>1</sup> Char's popularity is according to polls in <em>Newtype</em> magazine, which consistently put Char Aznable in the Top 20 list of most popular anime characters.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup> See <a href="http://www.colonydrop.com/index.php/2009/04/29/of-space-nazis-gundam-sequels?blog=1">Of Space Nazis, Gundam Sequels and the Horribly Underated MS Igloo</a> for an excellent analysis of the Nazi design aesthetic in Gundam.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Eulogizing Peter Drucker's ''The Effective Executive''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/22-Apr-09-eulogizing-peter-dru.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/22-Apr-09-eulogizing-peter-dru.php</id>
    <updated>2009-04-22T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">22 Apr 09 - Eulogizing Peter Drucker's <em>The Effective Executive</em></p>
<img src="http://www.ruggedelegantliving.com/a/images/Peter.F.Drucker.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>There are a number of <a href="http://www.workhomemoney.com/5-must-read-business-books/">blog posts</a> and <a href="http://www.askmen.com/money/successful_150/151_success.html">articles</a> about essential business books.  "Ten books everyone entering the working world should read," and such.</p>
<p>I only have two.</p>
<p>One, <em>Getting Things Done</em>, I've already talked about quite a bit here.  Just about everyone needs some way to organize their work.  GTD does a great job of explaining what you need to track (and what you don't).</p>
<p>But today, I want to write about <strong>Peter Drucker's <em>The Effective Executive</em>.</strong>  Drucker's the <strong>best writer on business and management</strong> I've ever read, and this is my favorite of his books.  It's also the most directly helpful to regular workers.</p>
<p>First, an explanation:  By "Executive," Drucker's referring to anyone in an organization who executes.  So, the book's aimed at those who work with their brain, which seems to be a large majority of the work force these days.</p>
<p>The book is a rumination on--and a set of advice for--knowledge workers.  We have to be responsible for our own work, while also fitting into a larger organization.  We have to manage our own time, while respecting time restraints placed on us.  We have to be independent and lead, appropriately.</p>
<p>Here are a few of his insights:</p>
<ul>
<li> Effective executives ask "What needs to be done?" and "What's right for this company?"</li>
<li> Take responsibility for communicating</li>
<li> Take responsibility for decisions, and make some</li>
<li> Run highly efficient and productive meetings</li>
<li> Think "we" instead of "I"</li>
</ul>
<p>Which sounds like standard business advice.  But each one of these (and more) are accompanied by in-depth thought and advice.  There's plenty of analysis of <em>what this means</em>, and all of it is clear and concise.</p>
<p>The book's amazingly valuable, if just to help one re-think one's place and responsibilities.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>A Japanese Noir French New Wave Black-and-White Yakuza Film</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Apr-09-a-japanese-noir-fren.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Apr-09-a-japanese-noir-fren.php</id>
    <updated>2009-04-20T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">20 Apr 09 - A Japanese Noir French New Wave Black-and-White Yakuza Film</p>
<img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51SPZ1C2ZHL._SL500_AA240_.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>So imagine a Japanese film, set in the 1960's, involving a down-and-out Japanese private investigator named Maiku Hamma ("My real name," he says), who takes a missing-person case and winds up in the middle of a yakuza/triad turf war.  He drives a convertible, wears a samurai-style jacket, and has an shoebox-sized office over a movie theater (you have to buy a ticket for the latest movie just to go up to see him).</p>
<p>It exists.  It's called <strong><em>The Most Terrible Time In My Life</em></strong>.</p>
<p>The director, Kaizo Hayashi, was obviously influenced by French New Wave, American noir, samurai, and yakuza films.  Everything's in black-and-white (almost), the characters are almost all tense (or hiding something, or both), and there's even a brief scene with Maiku's "mentor," who wears a white suit and uses a cane.</p>
<p>(If you're a die-hard <a href="http://www.mst3kinfo.com/">MST3K</a> fan, you'll be tickled to learn that the aforementioned white-suited mentor is played by the thick-jowled spaceship captain from "Star Force: Fugitive Alien" and "Fugitive Alien II," he of the maniacal laughter followed by "You're stuck here!")</p>
<p>See, this movie should be a terrible mess.  This should be confusing.  Instead, while the film certainly has its flaws, all of these elements work together.</p>
<p>Why?  Because the director's <em>influenced</em> by all those disparate film styles; he's not trying to make a film that embodies all of them.  He uses those styles to create effective scenes.  They're all tools.</p>
<p>The result is <strong>a remarkably entertaining film</strong>.  It starts out as simply great fun, then grows increasingly dark and brooding as the various plotlines accelerate towards the (inevitably bloody) end.  Which is exactly as it should be for this sort of film.  As long as you aren't expecting a mindless, high-speed action flick--Japanese movies rarely are--you'll probably get it.</p>
<p>And you'll find a <strong>weird, wonderful little gem</strong>.  I can't wait to see the sequel.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>P.T. Barnum Saves the World</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/26-Jan-09-p-t-barnum-saves-th.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/26-Jan-09-p-t-barnum-saves-th.php</id>
    <updated>2009-01-26T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">26 Jan 09 - P.T. Barnum Saves the World</p>
<img src="http://littletoyrobot.com/wp-content/barnum.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>This was a random, wonderful discovery at my local comic shop, and one of the advantages of and reasons for local comic shops.</p>
<p><em>Barnum</em> tells the story of P.T. Barnum, who gets drafted as a special agent to stop a mad Nicola Tesla from assassinating President Harding in a bid to take over the world.  And P.T. uses his circus performers to do it.</p>
<p>It's wild.  The performers run the gamut from a diminutive strong-man to a young punk acrobat to a wily female hypnotist.  They're all...well, they're all <em>geeks</em>, really, which is part of the appeal.  These are social outcasts who Barnum hired, and have formed something like a family.</p>
<p>And they go on a rollicking adventure across America, involving all sorts of then-state-of-the-art technology, from dirigibles to a calculating engine.  Fortunately for the reader's suspension of disbelief, P.T. Barnum's incessant collecting bug provides a reason for much of this technology to pop up:  he's either actively pursuing it, or his enemies are deploying it against Barnum's formidable forces.</p>
<p>But, ultimately, this is a fun, light action-adventure story.  One could easily compare this with <em>The X-Men</em>, Barnum serving as a manic Professor Xavier and his sideshow freaks as real-life mutants, minus energy powers.  And while <em>Barnum</em> delves into a little social commentary about society's outsiders (and the irony that they now do very well for themselves by highlighting the very attributes that make them outsiders), it's still mostly the story of stampeding elephants, high-speed chases, and charging pygmy warriors.</p>
<p>Great fun.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>The first samurai manga: Dororo</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Jan-09-the-first-samurai-ma.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Jan-09-the-first-samurai-ma.php</id>
    <updated>2009-01-07T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">7 Jan 09 - The first samurai manga: Dororo</p>
<img src="http://z.about.com/d/manga/1/G/6/9/-/-/Dororo1_500.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I recently finished reading something special.</p>
<p><em>Dororo</em> is a 3-volume manga by the "God of Manga," Osamu Tezuka.  It's essentially the invention of the modern samurai adventure genre.</p>
<p>Man, is it <strong>dark</strong>.  The story opens with a young father who promises his unborn son's body parts to 48 demons, in return for land and power.  As a result, his son Hyakkimaru is born as basically a mewling blob of flesh and bone, which his father casts away.  Hyakkimaru is taken in by a sympathetic inventor who, as the boy grows, invents makeshift prosthetic limbs for him.</p>
<p>The young man trains as a samurai, and soon heads off in search of the 48 demons; for each one he kills, he will regain a piece of his own natural body.</p>
<p>This leads to an interesting irony.  Hyakkimaru's prosthetic limbs are in many ways more powerful than normal ones:  they hide weapons and can surprise enemies when he removes them.  But he is profoundly grateful every time he loses one as a regular one takes place.  He deeply values <em>normal</em> limbs, as opposed to the super-charged false ones.</p>
<p>And then he meets a young punk thief, Dororo, who decides to tag along with him (ostensibly to steal Hyakkimaru's katana when he isn't looking).</p>
<p>So it turns into an adventure series, in a way: Hyakkimaru and Dororo wandering, searching for demons, and stumbling upon many human tragedies along the way.  There's plenty of supernatural horror and weird creatures, plus Tezuka's trademark musings on humanity's foibles and little triumphs.</p>
<p>Which makes it sound depressing.  It isn't, really; Hyakkimaru may be grim at times, and he lives in a dark time, but it's ultimately an uplifting story of a young man triumphing over great adversity.  Well worth the time, if you're willing to be challenged by a different kind of comic.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Review and Contemplations on ''Making It All Work''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/5-Jan-09-review-and-contempla.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/5-Jan-09-review-and-contempla.php</id>
    <updated>2009-01-05T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">5 Jan 09 - Review and Contemplations on <em>Making It All Work</em></p>
<img src="http://www.borders.com/ProductImages/products/00/57/81/a/57815498_a.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>It's funny what disappoints people.</p>
<p>Years ago, David Allen created a productivity system called <em>Getting Things Done</em>, which I've talked about quite a lot here on the blog.  He recently published <strong>a new book, <em>Making It All Work</em>,</strong> and the GTD community has gotten excited about what new gems of wisdom it might contain.</p>
<p>There's nothing new.  His original <em>Getting Things Done</em> book is still the foundation, and explains his recommended systems and methods.  <em>Making It All Work</em> explains the psychology behind GTD, what he discovered about human nature and his design of the system to flow with the ways human beings actually behave.</p>
<p>And people are disappointed.  They want revelations, deep wisdom, fireworks, and drama.  I suspect some of them secretly want new systems and formulae.  Nope.</p>
<p>Instead, we get an erudite exhortation.  Allen's eminently practical, and <em>Making It All Work</em> shows why humans need a system like GTD.  In a way, it's a proof for GTD, as well as encouragement to implement some kind of lightweight, air-tight system to track your work.</p>
<p>And people are disappointed, because the system has no drama, no big changes.  It just <em>works</em>.</p>
<p>Which is why I love it, and why <em>Making It All Work</em> was such a valuable read for me last week.  I now <em>deeply</em> understand the importance and consequences of an air-tight system.  I appreciate how much better life is in general when all one's work is written down, outside of one's mind, freeing the mind to concentrate on bigger questions.</p>
<p>Doesn't that sound good?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>The Guerilla Art Kit</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/3-Jan-09-the-guerilla-art-kit.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/3-Jan-09-the-guerilla-art-kit.php</id>
    <updated>2009-01-03T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">3 Jan 09 - The Guerilla Art Kit</p>
<img src="http://crookedhouse.typepad.com/crookedhouse/images/2008/07/16/paranoia2_by_filthyluker.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>So, a couple of weeks ago I was in a fancy stationery store, which sells all sorts of satisfyingly tactile papers, pens, sealing wax, etc.  Which was where I looked down and saw a book called <strong>the <em>Guerilla Art Kit</em>.</strong></p>
<p>It's a celebration of <strong>public artwork</strong>, such as posters and stickers posted on public buildings and signs.  More destructive forms include graffiti, but this celebrates less permanent forms of public expression.</p>
<p>The author points out that <strong>public spaces benefit from artistic expression</strong>.  The creation of beautiful artwork, and posting them publicly, helps society.  Imagine the random people who stumble upon a cheerful sticker or thought-provoking quote taped to an out-of-the-way wall.</p>
<p>It's also <strong>psychologically freeing</strong>.  It says a lot about a person who's willing to display their homemade artwork in a public space.</p>
<p>The book provides dozens of different ideas for guerilla art, from the easy (chalk art) to the daring.</p>
<p>So, it has lots of neat idea, and it just might push a few folks to try something outside their culture zone that expands their creativity.  Sounds good to me.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>The Abominable Charles Christopher</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Jan-09-the-abominable-charl.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Jan-09-the-abominable-charl.php</id>
    <updated>2009-01-01T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">1 Jan 09 - The Abominable Charles Christopher</p>
<center><img src="http://joehastings.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/2007-06-20.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imagecenter" /></center><br />
<p>There are so many good webcomics.  And so many good artists.</p>
<p><a href="http://horhaus.com/abominable/">The Abominable Charles Christopher</a> updates only once a week, and it's a four-panel strip, so not much happens.  It's slow.  And it's <strong>beautiful and emotionally involving</strong>.</p>
<p>It's drawn by an artist who works at LucasArts, so its beauty should not be surprising.  But the strip has a poetic, deliberate feel to it that I rarely see in Western-style stories.  It has the kind of steady hand on the tiller of story that I associate with, say, Jeff Smith's <em>Bone</em>.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Legends of Literature'' -- A Review</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/12-Dec-08--legends-of-literat.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/12-Dec-08--legends-of-literat.php</id>
    <updated>2008-12-12T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">12 Dec 08 - <em>Legends of Literature</em> -- A Review</p>
<img src="http://images.seekbooks.com.au/9781582974736.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Every so often, a book comes along that not only follows a great premise, it fulfills that premise completely.</p>
<p><em>Legends of Literature</em> is a collection of essays written by <strong>contributors to <em>Writer's Digest</em>.</strong>  Famous contributors, like Stephen King, H.G. Wells, Jack Kerouac, and Ray Bradbury.  There are good interviews with Kurt Vonnegut, Carl Sandburg, and George Bernard Shaw.</p>
<p>Much of it is writing advice, yes, but it's also a <strong>window into the minds of these great writers</strong>.  We get to see their approaches to fiction, and their opinions on the writing business.  Bradbury, for example, is breezy but pragmatic about the need to just sit down in front of the page and <em>write</em>, good or bad.</p>
<p>It's certainly an excellent book for writers, but it's also worth a look for bibliophiles who just want to know how writers think.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Does ''An American Tail'' Still Hold Up?</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/14-Nov-08-does--an-american-t.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/14-Nov-08-does--an-american-t.php</id>
    <updated>2008-11-14T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">14 Nov 08 - Does <em>An American Tail</em> Still Hold Up?</p>
<img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51MHRD0AZ5L._SL500_AA240_.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>It's Friday, review day, and I'm going to talk about a very special movie for me.  A formative movie.</p>
<p>I watched <em>An American Tail</em> when it was first released in theaters in 1986.  I was ten years old.  I was enthralled, and still remember the visceral thrill of several sequences: the storm on the ship, the singing of "Somewhere Out There," and the dockside cat chasing scene.</p>
<p>You probably all know I'm an anime fan.  Well, that's part of my larger interest in animation itself.  I watched with fascination several discs of weird Russian animated films and shorts, and have watched animated shorts from all over the world.  Animation just fascinates me.</p>
<p>And I think <strong>I can track it all back to <em>An American Tail</em>.</strong></p>
<p>I re-watched it recently.  That's always quite an experience, returning to a childhood favorite with the cold reasoning of an adult.</p>
<p><strong>The story falls apart.</strong>  There's very little connective tissue to link one scene to another; the entire movie almost feels like an excuse to put half a dozen intense sequences on screen.</p>
<p>But those sequences <em>are</em> <strong>intense</strong>, and I'd put three of them on par with anything Disney or Miyazaki's ever done:  the storm at sea, in which Fievel confronts a storm sweeping across the deck of the ship; the dockside cat chase, with its desperate scrambling to fire off a huge mechanical contraption; and the final search for Fievel, an amazingly quiet scene of an emotionally demolished boy.</p>
<p>The first two scenes are frenetic and powerful, with bold but careful uses of color and movement.  Neither scene ever confused me; instead, they presented a lot of action, going in what seemed like ten directions at once.</p>
<p>And it <strong>sold me on its protagonist</strong>.  Fievel wasn't just a boy in danger; it was a boy lost in a wondrous but confusing place.  The genius of the premise lay in the fact that he <em>wasn't</em> attacked by cats at every turn (any more than the entire mice population).  He was just...orphaned.</p>
<p>And I loved its representation of turn-of-the-20th-century New York (and America in general): <strong>amazing, ruthless, hectic, and truly a land of opportunity</strong>.  Flawed, certainly; there are sweatshops, discrimination, and a classically crooked politician (not <em>evil</em>, just completely crooked).</p>
<p>But it quickly becomes <em>home</em> for the characters.  Despite all its flaws, despite the tragedy of the story, America still represents great potential.</p>
<p>And it's saying a lot that I believe this despite the flaws in the story.  The movie can be difficult to follow at times, but <strong>it gets across deeper things</strong>.  Which is more than most works of art can say.</p>
<p>I'm certainly glad I re-watched it.  It's usually worthwhile to track down those old gems of childhood, if just to re-experience them.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Star Trek: The Motion Picture'', Director's Edition</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Nov-08--star-trek-the-mot.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Nov-08--star-trek-the-mot.php</id>
    <updated>2008-11-07T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">7 Nov 08 - <em>Star Trek: The Motion Picture</em>, Director's Edition</p>
<img src="http://www.sciscene.com/mib/star-trek-the-motion-picture.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>When I first watched <em>Star Trek: The Motion Picture</em>, my parents warned me that it was <em>long</em>.</p>
<p>Now, I grew up on the original <em>Star Trek</em> series.  I loved it.  I was willing to put up with a lot.  But <em>boy</em> was that movie long.</p>
<p>I recently got the chance to watch the newly remastered and re-edited version of <em>Star Trek: The Motion Picture</em>.  The original director partnered with a special effects company to restore some of the effects that were rushed out at the time.</p>
<p>Now, many of these restorations/special editions are attempts to improve the effects; make it look like what the director always wanted.  In this case, the director and the SFX company were both very clear on one point: that all the effects had to look like they had been produced in 1979.  They should look like <em>excellent</em> 1979 effects, but nothing modern.</p>
<p>They also edited down some of the longer shots.  Thankfully.</p>
<p>And the result is <strong>a very, <em>very</em> strong film</strong>.  While watching it, I couldn't even tell what had been changed (and I have a good eye for special effects).  Even the long shots of V'ger, the alien craft, were now majestic, but I couldn't tell what had been cut out.</p>
<p>The plot has always been an interesting one; Kirk struggling with command again after a long absence, the crew settling into its old habits, perplexed discussions about the incomprehensibly vast V'ger, and the steady drip of discoveries about it.  It's like one of the better original <em>Trek</em> episodes.  Nothing mind-bending, but definitely an entertaining and edifying use of your time.</p>
<p>Kudos to everyone involved!</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 5: ''The Old, Dark House''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/31-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/31-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-31T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">31 Oct 08 - Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 5: <em>The Old, Dark House</em></p>
<img src="http://eric.b.olsen.tripod.com/images/odh2.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I've saved the best for last.</p>
<p>I stumbled on this film on an internet search for classic horror movies.  It was made in 1932, directed by James Whale (<em>Frankenstein</em>, <em>Bride of Frankenstein</em>, <em>Show Boat</em>, <em>The Man in the Iron Mask</em>), and produced by the great Carl Laemmle, Jr. (<em>Frankenstein</em>, <em>Dracula</em>, <em>The Mummy</em>, <em>The Invisible Man</em>, <em>All Quiet on the Western Front</em>), and stars a first-rate group of actors.  It doesn't matter who they are; they all play their roles perfectly.</p>
<p>It starts with the <strong>hoariest of scary movie cliches</strong>:  a couple folks are out driving in a terrible storm, and take refuge in an Old, Dark House.  At least they aren't horny teenagers, I suppose.</p>
<p>The house's tenants hide <strong>dark secrets</strong>, of course, which are slowly revealed over the course of the night.  It <strong>feels like a stage play</strong>, at times, and I mean that as a compliment; I felt the stage's intensity as characters faced off.</p>
<p>One relationship shifts dramatically in the course of the night, and that was part of my big surprise.  This being 1932, not that far into the talkie era, the film industry's code of decency hadn't quite solidified yet.  As such, not only do we see a woman change out of a dress, wearing only a short shift beneath it, we're treated to this bit of dialogue from a girl describing her boyfriend:</p>
<table class="blogquote"><tr><td class="quoteAttribution">Gladys</td><td class="blogquote">He gives me a little money.  Oh, not very much, just enough to keep me going.  You probably won't believe me, but...Bill doesn't...he doesn't expect anything.  D'you know what I mean by "anything?"</td></tr></table>
<table class="blogquote"><tr><td class="quoteAttribution">Bill</td><td class="blogquote">Yes, I know what you mean by "anything."</td></tr></table>
<p>Remarkable.  We all know exactly what she means, but it's entirely implied.</p>
<p>In any event, the dark secrets are revealed, one by one.  And it's done <strong>masterfully</strong>.  The dread just builds, and builds, and builds, until a final climactic confrontation.  There's nothing magical or fantastical about it; no ancient spells or science fiction hand-waving (though the family is said to be under a curse).  It's just <em>personalities</em>, people, some deranged and some afraid and some grimly determined to get through it all.</p>
<p>A tremendous film.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 4: ''The Mummy''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-30T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">30 Oct 08 - Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 4: <em>The Mummy</em></p>
<img src="http://crazystable.squarespace.com/storage/mummy%20karloff.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Okay, this review is predicated on <strong>a surprise</strong>, but it's a surprise that happens ten minutes into the movie.  So I feel justified in explaining it, since it's the core of what I liked about the movie.</p>
<p>The classic <em>The Mummy</em> begins with a group of standard British archaeologists, enthusing over a new find: a mummy (Boris Karloff) and a sealed box, of which the former was buried alive, and the latter should contain the Scroll of Thoth, which was supposed to bring the dead back to life.</p>
<p>The older archeologists argue over what to do, the younger archaeologist opens the box, and the mummy comes to life and grabs the scroll.  Of course.</p>
<p>We then cut to <strong>ten years later</strong>, to the son of the head archaeologist in that scene, who is now digging in Egypt like his father did, where he is approached by...<em>Boris Karloff</em>.  Not wrapped in mummy bandages; just standing there, physically frail but psychically overwhelming.</p>
<p>So the entire movie is about the revived mummy, now walking about Egypt like any man, using his powers in a desperate attempt to revive his long-dead lover.  Of course, there are complications, and a surprisingly effective love story in the center of it, as is common in any 1930's movie.</p>
<p>Which is what makes it so effective.  It's not about a shambling, dusty corpse; <strong>it's about a driven man</strong>, blessed with ancient powers, and the normal humans who try to oppose him.  It's a contest of wills, and Karloff plays a man of such intense will that he steals every scene he's in.  He has immense gravitas; he practically glows with it.  My eyes were drawn to him in every scene.</p>
<p>Even <strong>the ending contains a bit of a surprise</strong>; the mummy may have succeeded in something rather horrifying.</p>
<p>Overall, it's a surprisingly effective movie, mostly because of Karloff's performance.  A great little film.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 3: ''The Wolf Man''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-29T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">29 Oct 08 - Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 3: <em>The Wolf Man</em></p>
<img src="http://cinefantastiqueonline.com/wp-content/wolfman2.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Watching <em>The Wolf Man</em> was a strange experience for me.</p>
<p>I first saw <em>The Wolf Man</em> in bits and pieces when I was <strong>in my early teens</strong>.  I really enjoyed the tense mood and varied characters.  I was in a phase of my life when I was watching a lot of black-and-white films, so I appreciated that type of movie: simple, direct, and reasonably well-acted.</p>
<p>Upon re-watching it this week...<strong>it doesn't hold up</strong>.  While it is simple, direct, and reasonably well-acted, the plot itself <strong>just drags</strong> in places.  It's a great example of pacing problems.  The story's fine; the editing and pacing just aren't tight enough.</p>
<p>It does play successfully off that perfectly horrible fear of <strong>loss of control</strong>.  The protagonist can feel his sanity slipping away, almost as soon as he contracts lycanthropy.  He's constantly haunted by it.  He's a decent man, and tries to be reasonable, but he <em>knows</em> what he's doing.  And how can a person stop himself?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the plot <strong>mires itself in side stories</strong> which distract from his path towards the beast, rather than highlight or enhance it.  As sweet and poignant as the love story is at times, it slows the movie down, and does little to bolster it.</p>
<p>But it does feature some solid performances and genuinely creepy moments.  <strong>Worth watching</strong>.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 2: ''The Masque of the Red Death''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-28T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">28 Oct 08 - Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 2: <em>The Masque of the Red Death</em></p>
<img src="http://cinefantastiqueonline.com/wp-content/masque_of_the_red_death_xl_01-film-b.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Vincent Price.  This is why Vincent Price is such a great horror movie actor.</p>
<p>You may have read the original Poe story, in which <strong>a corrupt prince holds a party at his manor</strong>, despite the raging plague outside.  Price plays the prince in this 1964 film version, which has been expanded into a study of evil.</p>
<p>And it's a solid little story, really, as Price's character brings in an innocent young peasant woman with great Christian faith, and shows her the decadence of his life and that of his peers.  He's completely given himself over to Satan, explicitly, and enjoys needling the girl with a faith completely opposite to her own.</p>
<p>There are <strong>a few sub-plots</strong> dealing with the girl's lover, the plague-ridden peasants outside, and another baron at the masque, which serve mostly as interesting highlights to the main story.  I was particularly thrilled by the bit with Skip Martin's character--a jester-like little person--who wreaks vengeance on a noble for his treatment of Martin's character's wife.  Besides Price, Martin's the best actor of the bunch.</p>
<p>The film was <strong>directed by Roger Corman</strong>, which I initially took as an ill omen.  Actually, the film looked just fine; perfectly competent directing.  That said, for such a gothic concept, I felt like it could've been shot much more imaginatively, giving the film a creepier, more intense feel.  This is meant to be <em>horror</em>, and much of it was filmed like a stage play.  That may be more the fault of the cinematographer Nicolas Roeg, though, who went on to direct some interesting things but I think fell flat here.</p>
<p>Despite the rather staid look of the film, it's definitely <strong>fun to watch</strong>, especially to watch Price be delightfully evil all the way through.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 1: ''The Thing From Another World''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-Oct-08-classic-horror-movie.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-27T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">27 Oct 08 - Classic Horror Movie Week, Day 1: <em>The Thing From Another World</em></p>
<img src="http://brentnewhall.com/graphics/blog/TheThingFromAnotherWorld.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>This week begins <strong>Classic Horror Movie Week</strong>, where every day I write about a classic "horror" movie, leading up to Halloween on Friday.  Um, that's Halloween the holiday, not Halloween the movie.  Anyvay.  I watched all these movies for the first time this week, so you're getting a fresh perspective.</p>
<p>I'm starting with <strong>Howard Hawks' <em>The Thing From Another World</em>,</strong> often called just <em>The Thing</em>.  The basic plot involves a group of military and scientists at an arctic research station, who discover a crashed UFO, and recover a body.  It thaws and comes back to life, and attacks them.  Cue frenzied gunshots and general mayhem.</p>
<p>What's remarkable about this film is how <strong>taut</strong> it is.  It's populated with half a dozen standout characters, each with distinctive personalities and viewpoints.  One driven scientist insists that the creature is too important of a scientific discovery to kill, even if it's attacking them.  One soldier is just plain freaked out by the thing.  A reporter is always asking for information or complaining about the news blackout.  The hero keeps a level head, of course, though he has his unsteady moments.</p>
<p>And <strong>they all interact</strong>.  Some of the characters become antagonists, but never villains.  They just all have different motivations.</p>
<p>Take that scientist.  He becomes a real blockade to the hero, but his opinions make complete sense.  He's not crazy; he just believes that the scientific discoveries possible from researching this alien are more important than their lives.  Understandable.</p>
<p>Apparently, the creature never looked scary enough for Hawks, so he did the next best thing:  it appears briefly, and then usually from a distance.  It's effective, really, turning the movie into more of a noir piece.  You fear the bad guy (whether the mob boss or the murderous alien) because the movie builds up to him.</p>
<p>Overall, <strong>I was impressed</strong>.  It's a solid little film, full of fun, interesting characters and a taut, fast-paced plot.  Like the best of the noir films, if nothing else it's an exhilarating ride.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>My Reaction To Tintin</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Oct-08-my-reaction-to-tinti.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Oct-08-my-reaction-to-tinti.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-24T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">24 Oct 08 - My Reaction To Tintin</p>
<img src="http://tintintribute.com/logos/tintin1.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>So I've finally bought and read some Tintin, the iconic comic book character created by French artist Herge.  Specifically, <strong>I read <em>The Adventures of Tintin, Volume 1</em>.</strong></p>
<p>I'd like to write that I loved it, that it was a work of genius.  I can't.  It had fun moments, and inventive moments.  It was certainly <em>good</em>, in a timeless sense.</p>
<p>But it just <strong>didn't come together for me</strong>.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Tintin">Tintin Wikipedia article</a>, Herge initially improvised all his stories, throwing Tintin into predicaments without knowing how to resolve them, then coming up with a solution on-the-spot.  As a result, the book features many frustrating cliffhangers of the worst sort, such as Tintin being rolled up in a carpet, shot, then thrown into a river, only to discover that Tintin had escaped from the carpet earlier (with no prior clues to indicate this).</p>
<p>Herge began planning his stories with <em>The Blue Lotus</em>, which is included in <em>Volume 1</em>.  The planning improves the storyline tremendously; I fully enjoyed that particular storyline.</p>
<p>Another problem was the characters.  Tintin's a plucky young man, but he lacks sufficient depth of character to make me really root for him.  The rest of the cast is filled out by <strong>broad, simple personalities</strong> common to the era.</p>
<p>I wouldn't mind that if the stories themselves carried any depth, but most of these adventures are, well, <em>adventures</em>--simple mysteries and thrillers.  <em>Astro Boy</em>, for example, has simple characters, but depth of plot.  Tintin just felt...simple.</p>
<p>Perhaps that's his appeal: <strong>simplicity</strong>.  I can appreciate that, and perhaps I'll revisit Tintin with an eye for clean stories and straightforward characters.  But for now, I can't be counted a Tintin fan.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>The Chatty DM</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Oct-08-the-chatty-dm.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Oct-08-the-chatty-dm.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-20T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">20 Oct 08 - The Chatty DM</p>
<p>Short one today, but I want to talk about this guy.</p>
<p>It's rare to come across a person as nice as the <a href="http://chattydm.net">Chatty DM</a>.  He blogs about D&amp;D, amiably and reasonably, and is a great font of knowledge and perspective.  He's very active on his comments and forum, too.</p>
<p>If you have any interest in fantasy roleplaying or D&amp;D, Chatty's a great place to check out, particularly for his forthcoming Kobold Love adventure idea.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Batman: Gotham Knight''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/10-Oct-08--batman-gotham-kni.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/10-Oct-08--batman-gotham-kni.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-10T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">10 Oct 08 - <em>Batman: Gotham Knight</em></p>
<p>This is an odd duck:  a bunch of <strong>Japanese animation studios</strong> each produced a <strong>short film about Batman</strong>, and assembled them into a movie.  Moreover, the shorts are all connected in a loose overall plot, despite the wildly different visual styles of each short.</p>
<p><em>Batman: Gotham Knight</em> features a Batman who is still mostly a <strong>whispered legend</strong>, even to police.  Indeed, the first film is entirely <em>about</em> that legendary aspect, as four teens describe their sightings of Batman in hilariously different forms--to one he's literally a shadow, to another he's a relentless machine, and to another he's a vicious half-bat.</p>
<p>Every story deals specifically with <strong>what it takes to be Batman</strong>.  In one, he tests a bulletproof energy field which turns out to be too effective.  In another, we see a young Bruce Wayne training in India to purge himself of his demons (you can imagine how well that goes).  In a later short, he slogs wearily through a sewer after a painful battle with Killer Croc.  I rather liked a short told from the perspective of two normal detectives, who debate Batman's effect on the city.</p>
<p>Some of the shorts <strong>work better than others</strong>, and much of my enjoyment of the film came from my interest in the animation styles.  Some are sketchy, some are beautifully fluid, and some are highly stylized.  The film remains interesting throughout.</p>
<p>However, because each short is so different, it can be a <strong>difficult film to watch</strong>, especially if you have no interest in Batman or animation.</p>
<p>Still, it was a noble experiment, and worth checking out.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>He's Way Too Calm In The Face of Imminent Alien Death</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Oct-08-he-s-way-too-calm-in.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Oct-08-he-s-way-too-calm-in.php</id>
    <updated>2008-10-07T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">7 Oct 08 - He's Way Too Calm In The Face of Imminent Alien Death</p>
<img src="http://www.worstpreviews.com/images/halo.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>So I'm terrifically behind the times when it comes to computer gaming.  But many months ago, I finally got around to playing the original <em>Halo</em>.</p>
<p>It's a perfect first-person shooter.  Now, that's all it is, but it provides a fantastic environment in which to shoot at things.  Excellent quality all around.</p>
<p>Until I noticed something: <strong>the character animation was surprisingly poor</strong>.  By that I mean that the movement and "body acting" of the other characters, particularly during cutscenes.</p>
<p>The ultimate example was during an alien attack on the ship I was in.  I watched through a window as an alien blew open the door to another room and shot a human technician.  The scene begins with bangs and explosions on the other side of the door, and I watched as the technician screamed "Help me!  They're coming in!" as he <strong>calmly straightened up</strong> from his chair, and turned towards the door.  His body was ramrod straight, his arms at his sides, even as he screamed in terror.  Then the door burst open and he died screaming.</p>
<p><strong>How did that get signed off?</strong>  Why didn't the technician at least crouch, or hold up his arms, or try to duck behind something in the room?</p>
<p>It made no sense, and it destroyed the believability of the scene.  The game became just a computer game, no more than a chunk of code twiddling bits and causing a set of sprites to waltz across the screen.</p>
<p>Disappointing.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Houses of the Blooded</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/16-Sep-08-houses-of-the-bloode.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/16-Sep-08-houses-of-the-bloode.php</id>
    <updated>2008-09-16T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">16 Sep 08 - Houses of the Blooded</p>
<img src="http://www.indiepressrevolution.com/xcart/covers/t_16616_01.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p><a href="http://www.saalonmuyo.com/">Saalon</a> and I have talked before about <strong>the future of tabletop roleplaying</strong>.  It started with the fantasy hack-and-slash of <em>Dungeons &amp; Dragons</em> in the 1970's, followed by the introduction of generic systems like GURPS and FUDGE in the 1980's (allowing for modern games, science fiction games, <em>etc</em>.), and the explosion of more open and acting-driven systems with White Wolf's <em>World of Darkness</em> in the 1990's.</p>
<p>What's next?  I think I may have found it.</p>
<p>I spent much of the weekend devouring a 400-page PDF for <strong><em>Houses of the Blooded</em>,</strong> a new tabletop RPG system.</p>
<p>Very roughly, it's <em>World of Darkness</em> in the Dune universe.  It's focused on helping you to <em>play</em> a <em>role</em> more than kill goblins.</p>
<p>In particular, players can temporarily take over as referee.</p>
<p>As with many tabletop games, whenever you attempt something tough and outside your character's normal abilities, you roll dice.  But the dice don't determine whether you succeed; if you roll high enough, <em>you</em> as the player get to decide if you succeed or fail.  If you don't roll high enough, the Narrator (Game Master/referee) decides if you succeed or fail.</p>
<p>So, no matter what you roll, you may still succeed.  But there's more to it than even that.  You roll a number of dice at a time, which may be more dice than you need.  You can reserve any number of dice as your "wager," and roll the rest.  If you roll high enough, not only do you succeed, you get to <strong>add one fact</strong> to the success for every die you reserved in your wager.  So, if you're leaping out of a bedroom, and you wagered three dice, you might say "Yes, I succeeded.  And there's a balcony outside, and I land on it, and it goes all the way along the building."  Three facts added for the three dice wagered.</p>
<p>This is revolutionary.  It provides a simple way for players to control the progress of the game.  They're not inventing super-powerful weapons out of thin air; they're influencing the game to make it more fun.</p>
<p>Can it be abused?  Well, anything can be abused, but the system makes it clear that 1) each fact must agree with the story so far, and 2) if you try to add a fact that helps you and hurts the other players, you're not welcome in the game.  Simple as that.</p>
<p>It's hard to describe why I find this so exciting.  It just feels <em>right</em> to me, and it feels like something that will help the roleplaying industry move forward.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Dead Poet's Society</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/12-Sep-08-dead-poet-s-society.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/12-Sep-08-dead-poet-s-society.php</id>
    <updated>2008-09-12T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">12 Sep 08 - Dead Poet's Society</p>
<img src="http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h88/romanwarrior/Movies/DeadPoetSociety.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>So I watched <em>Dead Poet's Society</em> a couple of months ago.  I'd heard it was good, but never really got around to it.</p>
<p>It knocked my socks off.</p>
<p>First off, it's <strong>beautiful</strong>.  The cinematographer goes to great lengths to capture the beauty of prep school grounds in New England.  From the fiery colors of the forest in autumn to a heavy winter snowfall, the movie just looks gorgeous.</p>
<p>Secondly, it's <strong>not about Robin Williams</strong>.  In fact, he's only in a few scenes, and in them he plays a quiet, bookish, somewhat eccentric literature professor.  Nothing wild about him at all.</p>
<p>Third, it's about <strong>growing up</strong>.  It's about a bunch of boys who realize the need to <em>carpe diem</em>.  Who realize that just doing what they're supposed to do isn't enough.</p>
<p>And the film's <strong>infused with great poetry</strong>.  Classic poetry.  Poetry to make one feel like the top of one's head had been taken off, to use Emily Dickinson's phrase.</p>
<p>It's a grand film.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Osamu Tezuka's Brilliant ''Buddha''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/6-Sep-08-osamu-tezuka-s-brill.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/6-Sep-08-osamu-tezuka-s-brill.php</id>
    <updated>2008-09-06T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">6 Sep 08 - Osamu Tezuka's Brilliant <em>Buddha</em></p>
<img src="http://www.paulgravett.com/articles/043_tezuka_buddha/buddha_image_2.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I recently finished <strong>Osamu Tezuka's <em>Buddha</em>,</strong> a manga adaptation of the life of Buddha.  It's about 3,000 pages that focus on the historical man, and the evolution of his philosophy, as opposed to attempts to teach you Buddhism.</p>
<p>I had to be careful when reading this book, as I couldn't simply pick it up, then put it down; I'd get sucked in and read through to the end.  This is partly due to Tezuka's unique style: he likes to mix up a dramatic story with occasional sight gags, and keep things moving with action scenes.  He had a tremendous gift for pacing and entertainment.</p>
<p>So the story moves quickly, and presents Buddha's life with sympathy and directness.  Again, this book doesn't try to teach you Buddhism; it chronicles Buddha's life.  However, one can't do that without exploring Buddha's philosophy.</p>
<p>I learned that the great spiritual teachers of Buddha's time mostly taught asceticism--that one must forego the pleasures of the world and punish one's body so as to free oneself from earthly desires.  While Buddha agreed with the importance of discipline and abstinence, he rejected the idea of inflicting pain or otherwise hurting oneself.</p>
<p>In fact, he believed in hurting <em>nothing</em>.  Radical for the time.  He really wanted to achieve enlightenment, and he struggled to achieve it.</p>
<p>Now, the manga glosses over a lot of Buddha's later religious teaching, which gets pretty extreme by non-Buddhist standards.  He claimed to perform astral projection every day, and that he could teleport.</p>
<p>But the manga cares less about that than about Buddha's moral journey.  I gained a nice understanding of Buddha's teachings; how they evolved in response to the events around him.</p>
<p>So, in all, I'm thoroughly glad that I finished this.  I learned a lot, and in a way that kept me entertained throughout.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Surreal, Yet Real</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/15-Aug-08-surreal-yet-real.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/15-Aug-08-surreal-yet-real.php</id>
    <updated>2008-08-15T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">15 Aug 08 - Surreal, Yet Real</p>
<img src="http://www.theempire.com.au/images/2006-03-17/Boogiepop%20And%20Others%20Novel.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Read a fascinating book lately: <em>Boogiepop and Others</em>.</p>
<p>It's the first novel in a whole franchise, which itself takes some explaining.  The franchise focuses on an entity called Boogiepop, which exists in the collective unconscious, and surfaces in certain people whenever a paranormal danger to humanity manifests.  So, yes, it's something of an urban fantasy.</p>
<p>This first book describes the initial conflict that brings Boogiepop to the surface today: a creature called the Manticore who feeds on human souls.  The franchise went on to spawn numerous novels, a live-action movie, an anime TV series, and a manga.  This is where it all started, as a single (award-winning) young adult novel.</p>
<p>The book's split into several parts, each one told from a different character's perspective.  Because of this, you often get to see the same scene from different characters' eyes, which changes your interpretation of that scene, and what was actually going on.  A great hook</p>
<p>The whole story takes place in a high school, which is key to the franchise.  <em>Boogiepop</em> is really about the high school years, when young people begin to solidify their philosophies on life.  Each character in the novel sees life very differently, but I can sympathize with all of them to varying degrees.</p>
<p>As a whole, I really enjoyed it.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>North World: The Legend of Conrad</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Aug-08-north-world-the-leg.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Aug-08-north-world-the-leg.php</id>
    <updated>2008-08-13T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">13 Aug 08 - North World: The Legend of Conrad</p>
<img src="http://brentnewhall.com/graphics/blog/north-world-sample.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>For the past two weeks, I've been trying to figure out how to describe <a href="http://www.north-world.com/">the online comic <em>North World</em></a>.  And I can't.</p>
<p>That's one of the reasons I like it.  <em>North World</em> has elements of a fantasy story--the protagonist wields a sword and confidently fights creatures in the wilderness.  But that's crossed with a very normal, modern world of cars and coffee shops.  It's a modern world with wildernesses that contain spirit bears.</p>
<p>Not long into the story, the protagonist returns to his hometown, a place he never wanted to come back to.  He left it a mess, and now he has to face it.  Which means he has to face himself, and the choices he's made.  And he doesn't like them.</p>
<p>He loves fighting in the wilderness, but he's <em>alone</em>.  And here with his family and old friends...he realizes everyone is together and happy.  And he's not.  In running off to pursue his dream, he burned his bridges, and he's beginning to realize the folly of that.</p>
<p>An unusual sort of story, and now that I think about it, I realize it's quite similar to <em>Zot!</em>, which I just finished (and heartily recommend to any human).  It pulls together the supernormal and the everyday, without debasing either.</p>
<p>An achievement, if nothing else.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>What I Think of My Kindle After 6 Months</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Aug-08-what-i-think-of-my-k.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/7-Aug-08-what-i-think-of-my-k.php</id>
    <updated>2008-08-07T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">7 Aug 08 - What I Think of My Kindle After 6 Months</p>
<p>I've written before about <strong>my Kindle</strong>, and how much I've used it (I read 3 books in the first week).  Now that I've had it for 6 months, <strong>my passion has cooled</strong>.</p>
<p>I still enjoy my Kindle, and I'm glad I bought it.  I like being able to read the WSJ any time I want to, without dealing with a paper.  I occasionally flip it open and read a bit more of a novel.</p>
<p>But I only use my Kindle every week or two now.  I have free books from the library, compared to paying a few dollars for Kindle versions.  And I'm not as mobile as I was, so I don't benefit from having a dozen books at my side all the time.  I have a thousand books right here.</p>
<p>But I'm still glad I bought it.  It's certainly much more convenient for books that my library doesn't have, and I do believe that devices like the Kindle are the wave of the future.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Johnny Bunko and His Career</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Jun-08-johnny-bunko-and-his.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Jun-08-johnny-bunko-and-his.php</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">24 Jun 08 - Johnny Bunko and His Career</p>
<img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1594482918.01.MZZZZZZZ.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Just finished--literally, just--a <strong>career management book</strong> called <em>The Adventures of Johnny Bunko: The Last Career Guide You'll Ever Need</em>.  It's pretty short, it's got good advice, and it's got great art.  It needs to be : it's a manga.</p>
<p>This sort of thing is commonplace in Japan, where you'll find how-to manga on just about any topic, from medical advice to sex.  So it's neat to see one on this side of the Pacific, written by a well-respected career guide (he also wrote <em>Free Agent Nation</em> and <em>A Whole New Mind</em>) and drawn by a top-notch American manga artist.</p>
<p>The advice is, as usual, <strong>simple but true</strong>.  With career advice, it's all about the presentation.  We all know the importance of much of this, but we need to be struck by it afresh.  Which he does.</p>
<p>For what it's worth, the book offers this advice:</p>
<ol>
<li> There is no plan.</li>
<li> Think strengths, not weaknesses.</li>
<li> It's not about you.</li>
<li> Persistence trumps talent.</li>
<li> Make excellent mistakes.</li>
<li> Leave an imprint.</li>
</ol>
<p>I argue that "talent" probably doesn't exist, but the point remains.  Again, this is all sensible stuff, but it's <strong>how it's presented</strong> that really makes it work.</p>
<p>The story follows Johnny Bunko, a recent college grad struggling to figure out why he's not satisfied at work.  He breaks open a pair of chopsticks, to be visited by a spirit who gives him career advice.  Sure, it's corny--and it's played that way--but it works.</p>
<p>Strongly recommended; I'm thinking of giving copies to everyone I know who's nearing college graduation.</p>
<p>There's also a great little animation at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Adventures-Johnny-Bunko-Career-Guide/dp/1594482918">the Amazon.com site</a>.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a>, <a href="/blogs/self-improvement/">Self-improvement</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Lagend, a colorful comic</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/19-Jun-08-lagend-a-colorful-c.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/19-Jun-08-lagend-a-colorful-c.php</id>
    <updated>2008-06-19T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">19 Jun 08 - Lagend, a colorful comic</p>
<img src="http://brentnewhall.com/graphics/blog/lagend.png" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>One of my favorite webcomics, <a href="http://www.north-world.com/">North World</a>, had a guest strip today by <a href="http://ndaniel.com/">Nick Daniel</a> of <a href="http://lagendcomic.com/">Lagend</a>, so I decided to <strong>check out Lagend</strong>.</p>
<p>It's got a <strong>unique art style</strong>, and I mean well by that.  Heads are mostly spheres, colors are bright but clear, everything is hand-drawn (including the lettering), and the artist has a thus-far-flawless sense of panel composition and timing.  The art style appears to be a fusion of manga, furry, experimental American comics, and <a href="http://vinnieveritas.com/">Vinnie Veritas</a>.</p>
<p>Note that there's some <strong>strong language</strong> here and there.</p>
<p>Either way, I like the story and the characters, and I'm looking forward to seeing what happens next.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''The Seven Swords''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Jun-08--the-seven-swords-.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Jun-08--the-seven-swords-.php</id>
    <updated>2008-06-13T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">13 Jun 08 - <em>The Seven Swords</em></p>
<p>Tsui Hark (<em>Once Upon a Time in China</em>, <em>A Chinese Ghost Story</em>) recently directed the martial arts epic <em>The Seven Swords</em>.  It's beautiful.  It's well-acted.  It's completely incomprehensible.</p>
<p>The basic story is pretty straightforward--the emperor has outlawed martial arts, and a small evil army roams the countryside, slaughtering all those that practice martial arts.  Someone comes to warn the village, two young people save that person, they wander for a while, then stumble upon the legendary Five Swordsmen hiding out in a mountain.  They all then return as the Seven Swordsmen to kick the collective butts of the small evil army.</p>
<p>But the direction is muddy, and the shots are too close and don't last long enough to make clear what's going on.  It's not unlike the <em>Transformers</em> CGI movie; even if the fights had been good, I couldn't tell what was going on.</p>
<p>And in an action movie, if I don't know what's going on, the movie loses all its fun.  I watch an action film so I can enjoy the action.  More depth than that is welcome, but it shouldn't betray its central <em>raison d'etre</em>.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>The Critical Path</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/6-Jun-08-the-critical-path.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/6-Jun-08-the-critical-path.php</id>
    <updated>2008-06-06T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">6 Jun 08 - The Critical Path</p>
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Buckminsterfuller.png/200px-Buckminsterfuller.png" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I recently finished reading <strong>Buckminster Fuller's</strong> <em>The Critical Path</em>.  If you don't know him, Buckminster invented the geodesic dome, and is generally considered a slightly crackpot visionary designer.  <em>The Critical Path</em> is one of his final books, in which he traces an overview of his life and mission.</p>
<p>In his early 30's, he decided to devote his life to "an experiment, to find what a single individual can contribute to <strong>changing the world and benefiting all humanity</strong>."</p>
<p>So he studied energy problems and designed an efficient worldwide energy grid.  He studied housing and developed inexpensive, portable housing (geodesic domes).  And so forth.</p>
<p>My main problem with his theories:  He was <strong>intensely rational</strong>.  He assumed that people would adopt geodesic domes because of their efficiencies, ignoring how people like to live in traditional houses.  Granted, he believed that people would adopt such things out of natural necessity, but I don't think people are that rational. People hold on to things.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Fuller impresses me.  He accomplished a huge amount in his lifetime; far more than I have.  This is a minor complaint about a giant of a man.</p>
<p>It's just a shame that humans can be blind like that.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Cool Hand Luke''</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-May-08--cool-hand-luke-.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-May-08--cool-hand-luke-.php</id>
    <updated>2008-05-30T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">30 May 08 - <em>Cool Hand Luke</em></p>
<p>Finally got a chance to watch <em>Cool Hand Luke</em> recently.  It's one of those films that are frequently referenced but infrequently seen.</p>
<p><em>Cool Hand Luke</em> works mostly on the effectiveness of its actors.  It's an intensely character-driven piece, with very little action.  It's all about the relationships between the characters, how the bounce off each other.</p>
<p>I was struck by the other prisoners' reaction to Luke.  He's very independent, seeing no need to observe the prisoners' little hierarchy.  He doesn't try to upset it, either; he just ignores it.  He wins the other prisoners' respect out of sheer tenacity and <em>difference</em>.</p>
<p>Their reaction?  They follow.  As impressed as they are at his independence, none of them try to be independent.  It's almost like they expect him to live out their own dreams of independence.  It's a terrible burden, and in the end it's one of the things that breaks him.</p>
<p>It's a beautiful film, too, full of the rising and setting sun, reflections in glasses, and creative shots.  But that's frosting on the cake; the actors drive the film.  And they drive it straight to eternity.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>''Fight Club'' - The Novel</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/23-May-08--fight-club---the.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/23-May-08--fight-club---the.php</id>
    <updated>2008-05-23T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">23 May 08 - <em>Fight Club</em> - The Novel</p>
<p>Awhile ago, I read the original novel of <em>Fight Club</em>.</p>
<p>I surprised myself by reading the entire book in two days.  Granted, it's a short novel, but normally I'm not that engrossed.</p>
<p>This was due to the novel's differences from the film.  Turns out, the film is an excellent adaptation of the novel, but many speeches and conversations in the novel are re-arranged to condense the story.  The book focuses tightly on the narrator, and the tale wanders as the narrator's mind wanders.  A film can't do that.  So, for example, Tyler Durden's "You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake" speech is composed of observations and bits of dialogue from Tyler scattered throughout the novel.</p>
<p>The novel ends in a completely different way than the film.  I think I like the film's ending better, though that's personal preference for the ending's style and content.  The novel ends on a darker note than the film, though it's a very Black Comedy sort of dark note.</p>
<p>I'm glad I read it.  If I adapt something in the future, I'd learn a lot from a deep study of the differences between the book and the film.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>RomeoRhino</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/22-May-08-romeorhino.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/22-May-08-romeorhino.php</id>
    <updated>2008-05-22T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">22 May 08 - RomeoRhino</p>
<p>After <em>Mystery Science Theater 3000</em> ended, I wondered if anyone else would pick up the mantle.  They stumbled upon the formula of recording voice-over riffs of bad pop culture movies, and surely someone else would continue.  The technology's easy enough.</p>
<p>Someone's done it:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/romeorhino">RomeoRhino</a>.</p>
<p>RomeoRhino is a YouTube user who takes public domain instructional videos (and a few movies), records himself riffing on them, marries the two, and uploads them to YouTube.</p>
<p>He's learned from <em>MST3K</em>:  he doesn't talk over the dialogue too much, he jokes as much as possible, he knows not to get too dark or sarcastic, and he keeps the jokes coming steadily throughout the entire video.</p>
<p>He posts a new video about once a week, and he's been doing it for a year, so there's plenty of material.  Some of my favorites:</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrfRBo8kt2k">The Snob</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFYVAuGfClE">Good Table Manners</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXP9tpvRJI">The Fun of Being Thoughtful</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uj-4nVltvQ">What About Drinking?</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Books!</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/19-Feb-08-books-.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/19-Feb-08-books-.php</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">19 Feb 08 - Books!</p>
<p>Ah yes.  I have a blog.  Forgot about that for a while.</p>
<p>Just been busy with other things.  Who has time for a blog when there's food to cook, novels to write, animations to draw, and books to read?</p>
<p>Books!  A few book recommendations:</p>
<p><em>Temeraire</em> volume 1, by Naomi Novik.  Imagine <em>Master and Commander</em>, with the addition of fire-breathing dragons.  Novik creates a believable world with fun characters.</p>
<p><em>By Right of Conquest, or With Cortez in Mexico</em>.  A novelization of Cortez's "conquest" of Mexico.  I love this bit of history, and this book captures all the high drama in an action-filled story.  This book has <em>everything</em>.</p>
<p><em>The Uncommon Reader</em>, a novella in which the present Queen of England discovers a love of books, late in life.  The book deftly explores her unique situation and regrets.</p>
<p>I thank my Amazon Kindle for the capacity for all the above books.  I spent a lot on it, and I regret not a penny.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Deeper Review of the Kindle</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-Jan-08-deeper-review-of-the.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-Jan-08-deeper-review-of-the.php</id>
    <updated>2008-01-27T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">27 Jan 08 - Deeper Review of the Kindle</p>
<p>More complete thoughts about the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Amazons-Wireless-Reading-Device/dp/B000FI73MA">Amazon Kindle</a>:</p>
<p>One's life changes when one has a device loaded with a handful of books.  It can easily fit in a large coat pocket, so I take it with me everywhere.  When I stopped by a nearby Chinese restaurant for some take-out, while I waited for my order, I read a few pages of a novel (instead of watching their VHS tape of <em>Dragonball Z</em>).  When I paused at work for some rest and a cup of tea, I read a few pages of a novel.  When I made lunch yesterday, as I waited to the fish to finish frying, I read a few pages of a novel.  I continued reading as I ate; because the Kindle lays flat and I just have to touch a button to turn pages, it's not nearly as awkward as holding open and flipping the pages of a book.</p>
<p>I've now finished two novels and am well into my third, in just over a week.  Moreover, there's tremendous power in finishing a novel by a good author, and being able to start reading the next novel in under a minute.  It's not just impatience; it's avoiding the whole process of tracking down the author's books, finding the next title in the series, adding it to a list of books to buy, and waiting for the next time I'm in a book store.</p>
<p>Moreover, because of the solid-state screen, the Kindle is more robust than most devices, and stays charged for a good week.</p>
<p>When I first heard of the Kindle, some folks prophesied it would be the "iPod of books."  I dismissed that notion, but I'm less dismissive now.  Certainly, books are used differently than music; I can listen to music all day and want my entire music library at all times, but not so with books.</p>
<p>That said, I can see a time when a lot of folks just take a reader with them pretty much wherever they go.  It's lighter than a paperback, it's darned convenient, and as Dan Brown and J.K. Rowling have proved, people <em>will</em> read.</p>
<p>Moreover, I sold 7 copies of my <em>Kindle Fan Guide</em> in two days.  There is a market out there.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>28 Nov 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-Nov-07-28-nov-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-Nov-07-28-nov-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-11-28T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">28 Nov 07 - 28 Nov 07</p>
<p>Warning:  Musings about animation work follow.</p>
<p>I stumbled on a DVD at Toys 'R' Us last week:  Disney Christmas collection.  For US $10, it has <em>Mickey's Christmas Carol</em>, <em>Pluto's Christmas Tree (the one with Chip and Dale)</em>, and <em>Small One</em>.  I'd never heard of that last.</p>
<p>So I popped it in, and watched 'em.  <em>Small One</em> had a long intro, and then the final two credits came up and I snapped to attention:</p>
<p><em>Produced by Ron Miller</em></p>
<p><em>Written and Directed by Don Bluth</em></p>
<p>Ron co-directed <em>The Great Mouse Detective</em> and <em>The Little Mermaid</em>, and of course Don Bluth is Don Bluth, so I immediately perked up.</p>
<p>It's an overtly Christian story, in which a boy in ancient Palestine tries to sell his favorite, sweet donkey, and nobody will buy it.  He eventually seells it to Joseph and Mary, as Joseph's the only one who sees the use of a calm, sweet donkey.</p>
<p>It's a fine little concept, aimed at a half-hour TV slot.  The early sequences of the boy and the donkey playing and working demonstrate their relationship beautifully.  The character animation is flawless.</p>
<p>But this is directed by Don Bluth, so we have two full-length musical numbers <em>in a half-hour film</em>.  The first occurs just after the boy's father breaks the news that the donkey, Small One, must be sold.  The boy (who looks exactly like Mowgli) then sings a sweet, quiet song about how much he loves Small One, despite the four minutes of previous animation demonstrating how much he loves Small One.  After half a minute, I fast-forwarded through the song.</p>
<p>The boy then goes to the city, where a guard (differently designed and animated; looked more like a Fleischer character) directs him to a nearby shop.  The animation becomes creepy and foreboding in the way that late 70's/early 80's animation could be (think <em>The Secret of NIMH</em> or <em>The Rescuers</em>).  Turns out this is the shop of a tanner.  The sequence plays a bit longer than necessary, but it's effective.</p>
<p>The boy and donkey run into the street, where we hit our next musical number:  the three wise men, as merchants, singing about how much they love to buy and sell things.  They toss around coins, they dance, they squash and stretch in a classic Don Bluth way, and they have nothing to do with the story.  The boy just watches this in shock and wonder, then moves on.</p>
<p>Perhaps Bluth was trying to convey the emptiness of commerce for commerce's sake.  But he does this again in the next sequence, where the boy tries to get Small One into a market, only to discover it's a high-end Horse Market.  The auctioneer and crowd mock Small One, looking only at his outward attributes and not his personality.</p>
<p>It works.  It overstates its point a bit, but it's an important point.</p>
<p>Then the boy, in despair, wanders to a quiet area, where Joseph steps up to him and asks if this donkey's for sale.  The boy sells Small One, we get a slightly tearful but upbeat farewell, and...</p>
<p>...we fade to a long shot of Mary and Joseph, with Mary riding Small One, then cut to a stable with a star shining down on it.  The end.  Oddly abrupt.  We get nothing more about the boy.</p>
<p>It's a shame.  If you cut out the musical numbers and tightened up the other sequences, <em>Small One</em> would be a great little film.  As it stands, it wears out its welcome.</p>
<p>A shame.  Especially considering how much <em>more work</em> it took to make this <em>worse</em> than a shorter version.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is a good example of Antoine De Saint-Exupery's dictum, "A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>24 Nov 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Nov-07-24-nov-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/24-Nov-07-24-nov-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-11-24T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">24 Nov 07 - 24 Nov 07</p>
<p>Saw <em>Beowulf</em> today, which was a disappointment and a joy.  Joyous to see well-animated fantasy action that managed to stay fairly true to the original story.  Disappointing because the story is modernized in ways that annoy me.  All the problems in the film are caused by men giving in to their horniness, contrasted with the principle woman, a long-suffering virgin.</p>
<p>It certainly should have been "R" rated.  Its status as an "animated film" exempted it, but that shouldn't matter.  The material in this film is "R" rated.</p>
<p>This may be the movie that opens up the American market for more mature animated films.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>16 Oct 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/16-Oct-07-16-oct-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/16-Oct-07-16-oct-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-10-16T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">16 Oct 07 - 16 Oct 07</p>
<p>I'm watching a fascinating bit of internet ephemera: <a href="http://www.buzz.mn/?q=node/2739">a sped-up video of a guy driving</a>.  This is not my first exposure to this type of web video; this one is genuinely interesting.</p>
<p>It's from <a href="http://www.lileks.com/">Lileks</a>, and I'm fascinated by the details.  Sometimes he follows closely, other times at a distance.  Sometimes he seems hurried, other times leisurely.  Why?  There are all sorts of little decisions and choices scattered throughout.</p>
<p>Plus, the soundtrack is one of Lileks' own techno remixes of a terrible song from classic <em>Star Trek</em>, which makes it worth watching in itself.</p>
<p>But I wonder:  What is it about these little windows into others' lives that make them so interesting?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>14 Oct 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/14-Oct-07-14-oct-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/14-Oct-07-14-oct-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-10-14T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">14 Oct 07 - 14 Oct 07</p>
<p>The second episode of <em>Gundam 00</em> came out last night.  My geekometer is off the chart; this is a giant robot anime series I'm downloading off the internet the day it airs because of how much I've loved previous shows in the franchise.  It's equivalent to a Chinese Trekkie downloading episodes of <em>Enterprise</em> as they come out.</p>
<p>Why do I have such devotion to an entire franchise?  Because so much of it is so good.  It tells serious war stories.  It has some amazing action sequences.  It's created some of the greatest characters in anime.  And, while the quality has varied over the decades, it's rarely disappointed for long.</p>
<p>So, I've been watching the buildup to <em>Gundam 00</em>, the latest series, with some interest.  It has a top-notch crew (the director of <em>Full Metal Alchemist</em>, the writer of <em>Trigun</em>, and the composer for the <em>Ghost in the Shell</em> movies), and planned to springboard off a popular past Gundam concept:  that the Gundams are rare, super-powerful war machines dropped into a gritty militaristic conflict.</p>
<p>I greatly enjoyed episode one, but first episodes are poor indicators of an entire show's quality.  It was a solid, action-oriented, broad introduction to a large cast of characters.  Episode two was a better test.</p>
<p>And it performed well.  A narrator explained the general political situation, a welcome addition to typically politically-oriented Gundam.  Several characters were developed a little, also welcome after that broad first episode.</p>
<p>And, you know, making any large-scale artistic work is <em>hard</em>.  It's hard to balance characters, story, character design, setting, artistic style, music, sound, voice acting, backstory, mechanical design, and a hundred other elements in a way that keeps them all from stepping on each others' toes.</p>
<p>So, it's nice seeing something that works.  And works well.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>1 Oct 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Oct-07-1-oct-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/1-Oct-07-1-oct-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-10-01T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">1 Oct 07 - 1 Oct 07</p>
<p>Roughed out <a href="Anime_Review_-_Gunparade_March.html">a review of <em>Gunparade March</em></a>, based on my viewings through episode five.  Tough show to watch, but very, <em>very</em> good.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>30 Sep 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Sep-07-30-sep-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Sep-07-30-sep-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-09-30T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">30 Sep 07 - 30 Sep 07</p>
<p>Added <a href="Anime_Review_-_KamiChu.html">a review of KamiChu!</a>, which I finished yesterday.  Nice little slice-of-life show.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>26 Sep 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/26-Sep-07-26-sep-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/26-Sep-07-26-sep-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-09-26T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">26 Sep 07 - 26 Sep 07</p>
<p>Finished <em>Texhnolyze</em>.  What a mind trip.  It's a perfect ending for this particular show, but it's tragic.  Sad, in the sense of watching an insect get trapped in tar.  You know it's not getting out of there.</p>
<p>It's odd.  I never want to create a show like this.  I don't like depressing stories, and I certainly don't like <em>Texhnolyze</em>.  It is well-made, and thought-provoking.  I appreciate it.  I value it.  It's a strong work of art.</p>
<p>There aren't that many of those in the world.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>25 Sep 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/25-Sep-07-25-sep-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/25-Sep-07-25-sep-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-09-25T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">25 Sep 07 - 25 Sep 07</p>
<p>Been watching <em>Texhnolyze</em>.  It's pure science fiction.  It's dystopian storytelling.  It's...<em>true</em>.  Real.</p>
<p>I disagree with some of its philosophy, strongly, on a lot of levels.  But that's surely part of the point, to watch and think and form opinions (reactionary or otherwise).</p>
<p>Nice to have something I can sink my teeth into.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>17 Sep 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/17-Sep-07-17-sep-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/17-Sep-07-17-sep-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">17 Sep 07 - 17 Sep 07</p>
<p>It's amazing to watch people create something out of nothing.</p>
<p>Case in point: the first five episodes of <em>Space Battleship Yamato</em>, which I watched recently.  Made in 1974, when anime was still a bunch of crude cartoons for kids, this is a show with weight and melancholy.  It's slow and deliberate.  We spend whole episodes in almost real time.  We see huge futuristic cities, empty due to the prolonged war with Gamilon.</p>
<p>This was in <em>1974</em>.  A tremendous accomplishment.  All because they decided to do it.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>13 Sep 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Sep-07-13-sep-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Sep-07-13-sep-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-09-13T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">13 Sep 07 - 13 Sep 07</p>
<p>Just finished watching Brad Bird's short film, <em>Family Dog</em> (it's on YouTube).  It was an episode of the old anthology TV series <em>Amazing Stories</em>, if you remember that.</p>
<p>Fascinating.  It's a solid story, very funny in parts, and drawn in a very modern, minimalist style.  What's most remarkable is that it isn't amazingly brilliant.</p>
<p>And that's comforting.  Brad Bird didn't start brilliant then flame out.  He's gotten better as he's aged.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>4 Aug 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/4-Aug-07-4-aug-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/4-Aug-07-4-aug-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-08-04T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">4 Aug 07 - 4 Aug 07</p>
<p>Saturday.  My Media Fast is finished, so I spent much of the day catching up on anime:  <em>Mushi-shi</em>, <em>Pani Poni Dash</em>, <em>Infinite Ryvius</em>, and <em>Gundam Seed Destiny</em>.</p>
<p>They were all excellent, in different ways.  <em>Mushi-shi</em> is a set of <em>Twilight Zone</em>-style dramatic episodes, but with positive endings.  <em>Pani Poni Dash</em> is a spastic, fast-paced comedy that manages to retain its speed and entertainment value throughout.  <em>Infinite Ryvius</em> was tough to watch, because it was so dramatic that I didn't want to see bad things happen to the characters, but to my relief I was completely satisfied by the ending.  And <em>Gundam Seed Destiny</em> I'm rewatching so I can loan it to friends.  And it's just so good (except when it's not, which is rare).</p>
<p>Then, after making a batch of cookies, I was off to meet a friend and watch <em>Harry Potter</em>.  But the theater changed their showtimes, so we saw <em>The Simpsons Movie</em> instead, and it was utterly entertaining throughout.  A solid flick.  I was gratified to see that the theater was completely full.  The film deserves it.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>2 Aug 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Aug-07-2-aug-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Aug-07-2-aug-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-08-02T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">2 Aug 07 - 2 Aug 07</p>
<p>I've discovered a downside to this week's media fast:  as a single guy who lives alone, it's <em>lonely</em>.  I come home from work, and I'm tired, and all I have are my projects.  Oh, I could go for a walk.  But even that's lonely.</p>
<p>Not that I'm complaining; just commenting.  I was a little depressed this morning, but that passed when I got to work.  And I had a good day at work; purposeful and interesting but not stressful.</p>
<p>In fact, there was so little stress that I went out for lunch, toting my laptop with me, and watched two episodes of anime.  (Okay, okay, yeah, it's a break from my Media Fast.  There are no MF Police.)  Watched <em>Lucky Star</em> episode 16, and the second episode of <em>Goodbye, Professor Zetsubou</em>.</p>
<p><em>Lucky Star</em> continues to get better.  The first seven or so episodes were merely enjoyable; after that it just kept getting funnier with each episode.  As funny as the Comiket episode was, this was fantastic.</p>
<p>And I'm even more impressed with <em>Goodbye, Professor Zetsubou</em> as of its second episode.  The first established a terminally depressed, suicidal teacher and his perpetually chipper female student.  It was a highly stylish comedy which seemed to establish its duo.  But the second episode introduced half a dozen other students, created a very complicated set of relationships, and didn't resolve any of it.  Apparently this won't just be individual episodes of zany hijinks.  Nice, for a change.</p>
<p>Anyvay.  After a long, slow afternoon, I stopped by my parents' house for the evening.  After a brisk swim and a light dinner, we spent the evening bouncing between the foreign-language channels on the TV, mocking an impenetrable Dutch (?) film (almost as bad as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xslyoK9uobE">Jay Sherman's student film</a>) and trying to translate the Cantonese and Japanese news programs and dramas.  Great fun.</p>
<p>So now, I'm laying on my bed at 11:30 <span style="font-size: 60%">P.M.</span>, typing this blog entry.  On balance, I like this day.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>17 Jul 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/17-Jul-07-17-jul-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/17-Jul-07-17-jul-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-07-17T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">17 Jul 07 - 17 Jul 07</p>
<p>Just finished watching <em>The Last Unicorn</em> for the first time.</p>
<p>I know several people who love this film.  They all saw it first when they were kids.  And I think that explains their love.  I just don't think it's a great film.</p>
<p>Why?  Well, I'm no big fan of America's music; it's okay, but it's just okay.  The voice work is superb.  The colors are perfect.  But the animation..., well, there are several aspects to animation, and it always annoys me when people criticize "the animation" of a piece.  So, let's break that down.</p>
<ol>
<li> First, there's the <strong>aesthetic beauty of the art</strong>.  Does it look beautiful, or does it look like <em>Star Trek: The Animated Series</em>?  Full marks here.  I admit I love Rankin-Bass's designs, but beyond that the backgrounds are lovely and the colors are just right.</li>
<li> There's the <strong>sheet count</strong>.  How many frames of animation (drawings, or sheets) are in an average minute of film?  More is better (generally).  ''The Last Unicorn has a pretty good sheet count for an animated film.  Not Disney, but not Space Ghost.</li>
<li> There's the <strong>quality of the drawings.</strong>  Do the characters look the same in each shot?  Are characters facing the right directions when the shot changes?  <em>The Last Unicorn</em> is, again, pretty good in this department--there are several places where characters are pointing the wrong direction after a shot change, but generally the characters look the same from shot to shot.</li>
<li> Then there's the realism of the characters.  How do people walk?  Are they stiff or natural?  When a girl puts on a pair of shoes, does she put them on one at a time, mechanically and obviously, or does she just slip them on without thinking?  <em>TLU</em>'s not so hot on this score.  Lots of weird gestures.  If I'm making a point during conversation, I don't wave my hand back and forth across my chest.  When I walk, my arms aren't hanging stiff at my side.</li>
</ol>
<p>So, the animation is mediocre.  There are good qualities to it, but much of the physical acting is depressingly stiff.</p>
<p>Then again, most of the Japanese staff went on to make a little film called <em>Nausicaa of the Valley of Wind</em>, which is better than this but does suffer from some stiff character movement.</p>
<p>The writing, unsurprisingly, is excellent.  Some great lines in there.  And while I was annoyed by the trite obviousness of the first two-thirds of the film, I was surprised when it pushed at the fourth wall as the characters debated meta issues like the requirements of the heroic form.  Neat, though a bit jarring.</p>
<p>And the end was great (I'm amused that Miyazaki cribbed elements for the ending of <em>Nausicaa</em>).</p>
<p>So, overall, much as I'm sorry to say...I didn't much like <em>The Last Unicorn</em>.</p>
<p>A small voice warns me of hubris.  It whispers in my ear, spinning a memory.  I feel the cool air of the movie theater, and the presence of the girl at my side.  I was nine years old.  I was drinking in the greatest animated experience of my young life: <em>An American Tail</em>.  If there's one reason that I've watched hundreds of animated films and series, that's the reason.</p>
<p>But <em>An American Tail</em> had many, many more flaws than <em>The Last Unicorn</em>.  I couldn't see past them then, and I can't see past many of them now.  That movie formed me.</p>
<p>And so, if this film formed others, who am I to judge too harshly?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>29 Jun 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Jun-07-29-jun-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Jun-07-29-jun-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-06-29T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">29 Jun 07 - 29 Jun 07</p>
<p>Saw <em>Ratatouille</em> tonight.  The 6:30 <span style="font-size: 60%">P.M.</span> showing was sparsely attended, which shouldn't have been a surprise for a "kid's movie."</p>
<p>It was one of the most beautiful things I've seen in a long time.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>9 Jun 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/9-Jun-07-9-jun-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/9-Jun-07-9-jun-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-06-09T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">9 Jun 07 - 9 Jun 07</p>
<p>Finished watching <em>Bubba Ho-Tep</em> today.  Surprisingly fantastic film.  Yes, it's cheesy at times--the plot involves the real Elvis, stuck in an old folks' home, who confronts a 4,000-year-old soul-sucking mummy--but like all really good films, it transcends its concept by really <em>examining</em> its concept.</p>
<p>Imagine an Elvis who's <em>old</em>.  Way past his prime.  Spends almost all of his time in bed.  He switched places with an impersonator and lost everything, and now there's nothing left.  All of his family is gone.  He's surrounded by old folks who've been cast off by their family.</p>
<p>And then he finds out there's some kind of <em>thing</em> that's feeding off the other residents.  And he has to decide if he'll do something about it.</p>
<p>Most of the movie focuses on an old man deciding to make something of what time he has left.  In some ways, it's an ageless premise.  It's also modern as we confront an aging population.</p>
<p>Plus, it stars Bruce "God" Campbell.  Can hardly go wrong there.  I now appreciate why he's been encouraging his fans to see this film; it's a fantastic role.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>31 May 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/31-May-07-31-may-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/31-May-07-31-may-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-05-31T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">31 May 07 - 31 May 07</p>
<p><em>Tom Swift and His Jetmarine</em> was as thoroughly entertaining as I'd hoped.  A great read.</p>
<p>Now, on to <em>Shogun</em>.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>29 May 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-May-07-29-may-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-May-07-29-may-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-05-29T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">29 May 07 - 29 May 07</p>
<p>I finally got my hands on a Tom Swift book.  By luck, it's the second book in the Tom Swift Jr. series (<em>Tom Swift and His Jetmarine</em>).  I've been curious about the quality of these rousing adventures for years.</p>
<p>And boy, is this book <em>fun</em>.  It's all breathtaking adventures and sci-fi inventions, though the author at least attempts to make the inventions plausible.</p>
<p>And the adventure...I don't think I've ever read a book with this rapid a pace.  I doubt there's more than three pages between action scenes.  There's just enough dialogue to answer a question and raise a few more before something exciting happens.</p>
<p>Which is great.  I doubt one could keep up this pace for five hundred pages, but for a quick young adult novel it's fine.  Meanwhile, the story rockets along.  Great stuff.</p>
<p>Much as I like the modern novelistic tendency towards drama and character development, I wonder if that couldn't be toned down somewhat in favor of this.  This is pure entertainment.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>28 May 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-May-07-28-may-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/28-May-07-28-may-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-05-28T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">28 May 07 - 28 May 07</p>
<p>Saw <em>Spider-Man 3</em> last night, during a lovely evening spent with <a href="http://sayitsomehow.blogspot.com/">Mandy</a> and Kirstin.</p>
<p>I have a troubled history with the <em>Spider-Man</em> movies.  The first one had comparatively little web-slinging action.  And what action there was, was stunted by Peter's lack of experience.  It just didn't have full-scale fun Marvel battles.</p>
<p><em>Okay</em>, I thought, <em>it's the first movie.  He's inexperienced.  The second one will be more fun.</em>  But no, in the sequel Peter loses his confidence and spends most of the movie <em>rejecting</em> Spider-Man.  So we get a modicum of action in that, especially considering its length.</p>
<p><em>Okay, okay</em>, I thought.  <em>He's got his confidence back.  Surely the third movie will be more fun.</em>  But no, in this movie we spend so much time on his relationship with Mary Jane that there are only a few full-on action scenes.  Excellent action sequences, but the stuff with Mary Jane just dragged.</p>
<p>Disappointing.  But I did like this film more than <em>2</em>.  The Sandman was perfectly handled, and a shining example of a Marvel character:  Right or wrong, he has very human reasons for his actions.  Venom was protrayed well, though I would've liked more of him.  Venom's all about that dark whisper that tells you to have more power, which is often very, very helpful.  In this film, it turns Peter evil almost immediately.</p>
<p>Y'know, in the comics, Peter's relationship with Mary Jane was a crucial spice to the story.  It deepened and intensified his worries and self-doubt.  But over-spice a dish, and the flavor is ruined.  I don't go to a Spider-Man movie to watch Peter Parker court Mary Jane.</p>
<p>This has turned into a rant, and I usually avoid ranting.  I appreciate what the filmmakers are trying to do with these movies, and I'm not saying they failed.  I'm glad they're trying to get women interested by increasing the romantic aspects.</p>
<p>I'm just disappointed that one of the most fun, dynamic action/adventure superheroes of all time spends half his movies being an idiot with Mary Jane.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>27 May 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-May-07-27-may-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/27-May-07-27-may-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-05-27T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">27 May 07 - 27 May 07</p>
<p>Just finished reading Neal Gabler's exhaustive biography, <em>Walt Disney</em>.  What a man.</p>
<p>He spent his entire life dissatisfied.  The animations were never good enough.  The parks never had enough rides.  His legacy wasn't big enough.</p>
<p>This from a man who legitimized an art form, then immediately created several classics within that form.  Then he revolutionized the amusement park, applying standards of cleanliness and excellence that have changed the general standard.</p>
<p>And yet, a nurse wrote to his family, "I took care of Walt in his final days, and just want you to know that the poor man was so fearful."</p>
<p>Is contentment really so far out of reach?</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>29 Apr 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Apr-07-29-apr-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/29-Apr-07-29-apr-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-04-29T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">29 Apr 07 - 29 Apr 07</p>
<p>Last week's trip seems to have given me a touch of...something.  I won't describe the grotesque details, but safe to say I am sick.  I hope it won't last; I want to go to work tomorrow.</p>
<p>I comforted myself by watching <em>Versus</em>, a movie by the live-action Japanese director I saw last weekend, Ryuhei Kitamura.  It's a samurai zombie revenge film, and it was just wildly entertaining.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>13 Apr 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Apr-07-13-apr-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/13-Apr-07-13-apr-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-04-13T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">13 Apr 07 - 13 Apr 07</p>
<p>Just finished watching Kurosawa's <em>The Hidden Fortress</em>.</p>
<p>I like Kurosawa's films, but I just don't love them like many people do.  This one's no exception; it's very good, but I've no interest in watching it again.  Well, except for one spear fight halfway through.  But he holds his shots for much longer than I feel necessary, and the story just drags on.</p>
<p>Ah well.  Worth seeing.  The included interview with George Lucas was enlightening, too.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>10 Apr 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/10-Apr-07-10-apr-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/10-Apr-07-10-apr-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-04-10T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">10 Apr 07 - 10 Apr 07</p>
<p>Just finished watching the first episode of the first anime: the original <em>Astro Boy</em>.  A few thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li> The animation is often terrible.</li>
<li> ...but occasionally excellent.</li>
<li> Tezuka's direction shines in a few amazing, dramatic, downright cinematic shots.  Often they're motionless, but the shadows and angles provide amazing power.</li>
<li> If today's anime fans complain about American actors "murdering" roles, they should hear this.  (And to be fair, that's what cartoon voice acting <em>was</em> back then; all of it.)</li>
</ul>
<p>Worth seeing, but I'm glad I didn't buy it.  Thanks to Mom and Dad for their purchase of a six-month <a href="http://www.netflix.com/">Netflix</a> subscription for me.  I can see myself falling in love with this service.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>2 Apr 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Apr-07-2-apr-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Apr-07-2-apr-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-04-02T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">2 Apr 07 - 2 Apr 07</p>
<p>Finally watched volume one of <em>Madlax</em>, an anime by the creators of <em>Noir</em> and <em>.hack</em>.  The creators have great confidence in their stories, so much so that the first third of each series contains almost no plot, focusing instead on establishing the characters.</p>
<p>This is fine if you love the characters.  While I like <em>Madlax</em>'s protagonists more than those of <em>Noir</em>, with no context for their actions I have little interest in buying volume two (which may also shuffle along).  It's a perfect example of the problem of TV scheduling; I'd be interested enough to catch this every week, and the plot of later episodes would probably hook me.  But releasing four episodes at a time on DVD is a different model with different forces at work.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>26 Mar 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/26-Mar-07-26-mar-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/26-Mar-07-26-mar-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-03-26T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">26 Mar 07 - 26 Mar 07</p>
<p>Saw the new <em>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles</em> movie.  It was perfect, in the mathematical sense of containing everything needed.  There were things I didn't know I'd want to see in there until I saw it.  They tossed in a reference to the opening credit sequence of the original cartoon, for Pete's sake.  It proves that one can make a great homage that's also highly entertaining, a sadly unusual combination.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>5 Mar 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/5-Mar-07-5-mar-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/5-Mar-07-5-mar-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-03-05T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">5 Mar 07 - 5 Mar 07</p>
<p>I finally finished the last volume I own of <em>Astro Boy</em>, volume 15 (it goes up to at least 23, according to Amazon).  Its creator, Osamu Tezuka, was a breathtaking writer.  In one simple boy's action manga, he tackled bigotry, humanity, inhumanity, the nature of evil, and the nature of goodness.</p>
<p>Not that his works were perfect.  The setups were often silly, the characters often one-dimensional.  But he was drawing a boy's action manga.  For what it was, it was impressive.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>3 Mar 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/3-Mar-07-3-mar-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/3-Mar-07-3-mar-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-03-03T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">3 Mar 07 - 3 Mar 07</p>
<p>Saw <em>Amazing Grace</em> last night, after a fantastic dinner of sushi and sake with <a href="http://sayitsomehow.blogspot.com/">Mandy</a>.</p>
<p>It was a surprisingly nuanced film.  Those in favor of the slave trade weren't all evil; in fact, all of them had positive sides.  The film focused on the human rights abuses of the slave trade.  All the characters were multifaceted and well-played.  The film <em>felt</em> real.</p>
<p>There were a few tiny problems, but they were tiny.  It was definitely well worth seeing.  Even at 10:00 p.m.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>21 Feb 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/21-Feb-07-21-feb-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/21-Feb-07-21-feb-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-02-21T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">21 Feb 07 - 21 Feb 07</p>
<img src="http://brentnewhall.com/graphics/battle.jpg" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>I've finally watched <em>Battle Angel Alita</em>, an early-90's anime OVA that was a classic for its time.  It's less impressive today, though it's still a dark piece with some beautiful action sequences and a solid philosophical core.</p>
<p>It's set in the future, in a literal junk city.  The populace lives off the junk discarded from a floating paradise above.  The protagonist is an android reconstructed from state-of-the-art parts inexplicably junked from the paradise.  Her friends are various "low-lifes" fighting to survive, and she decides to fight with and for them despite not needing to.</p>
<p>Most of the characters betray their morals to get what they want.  But they all suffer for this.  The anime is less an indictment of humanity as a sad display of its frailty.  It seems to be saying that people are capable of good, but keep tripping themselves up.</p>
<p>Which is a fair assessment, I suppose.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>20 Feb 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Feb-07-20-feb-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/20-Feb-07-20-feb-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-02-20T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">20 Feb 07 - 20 Feb 07</p>
<p>Spent some time recently watching two favorite cartoons of my childhood, <em>Tiny Toon Adventures</em> and <em>Animaniacs</em>.  <em>Animaniacs</em> is usually considered the better show; it could be far more funny.</p>
<p>But I was struck by how consistently entertaining <em>Tiny Toons</em> was.  The humor in <em>Animaniacs</em> was often so left-field that I was just bored.  I could watch <em>Tiny Toons</em> all day.</p>
<p>Sometimes, you can be so different that you become incomprehensible.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>19 Feb 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/19-Feb-07-19-feb-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/19-Feb-07-19-feb-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-02-19T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">19 Feb 07 - 19 Feb 07</p>
<p>Last Saturday, I attended a choral concert by the <a href="http://msva.choralmusic.org/">Master Singers of Virginia</a> of Rachmaninoff's <em>Vespers</em>.  It was beautiful beyond words.</p>
<p>"Vespers" is actually a misnomer.  It was written for the All Night Vigil, which lasts from Vespers (the evening service) through Matins (the night/early morning service) to Prime (the dawn service).  Thus, the music begins by echoing the quiet, lilting liturgy of the candlelit evening service, reaching a crescendo of adoration and supplication in the middle of Matins, then calming back down just before a big finish to herald the dawning sun.</p>
<p>The work only lasts for an hour; it's meant to be interspersed with prayer, Scripture reading, <em>etc.</em>  But it's amazingly beautiful.  Rachmaninoff composed it like he would a symphony, so the various vocal sections mirror and complement each other in gorgeous melodic patterns.</p>
<p>And ironically, Rachmaninoff wrote it during the middle of World War I, just after several of his friends had died.  War spurred his musical commentary, perhaps.</p>
<p>You can <a href="http://msva.choralmusic.org/recordings.html">listen to MP3s</a> or <a href="http://msva.choralmusic.org/recordings.html">buy CDs</a> of the Master Singers' performances.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>11 Feb 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/11-Feb-07-11-feb-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/11-Feb-07-11-feb-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-02-11T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">11 Feb 07 - 11 Feb 07</p>
<p>On Thursday I caught a matinee of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457430/"><em>Pan's Labyrinth</em></a>, the new fantasy film by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0868219/">Guillermo Del Toro</a>.  The fantasy aspects were perfectly done--surreal and truly <em>fantastic</em>--and the direction was slick as butter.  A lovely piece.</p>
<p>But <em>boring</em>.  I didn't care for any of the characters, and the plot just plodded along.  Besides, I had problems with both plot threads:  El Capitan and his pursuit of rebels, and Ofelia's exploration of the labyrinth.  But El Capitan was evil and shallow, so I didn't care about his plot.  And Ofelia's trials quickly got dark and disturbing, and I really didn't want to watch that.</p>
<p>So I walked out halfway through.  Not because it was a bad film, but because it was insufficiently good.  I'd rather spend that second hour, well, re-reading <em>Lord of the Rings</em>, if nothing else.</p>
<p>Side note:  The only other Del Toro movie I've seen was <em>Hellboy</em>, which I thoroughly enjoyed.  Both <em>Hellboy</em> and <em>Pan's Labyrinth</em> are filled with self-absorbed characters who are paying the price for their self-absorbtion.  <em>Hellboy</em> was interesting, because they were also bashing demons.  In <em>Pan's</em>, there was no other distraction.  It became an artsy foreign film about suffering, egotistical Europeans, with a faun.  No thanks.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>3 Feb 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/3-Feb-07-3-feb-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/3-Feb-07-3-feb-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-02-03T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">3 Feb 07 - 3 Feb 07</p>
<p>A few days ago, I finished reading Kate Williamson's <em>A Year in Japan</em>.  It's a short but sweet read, since it's mostly pictures.  She painted watercolors of the many things she saw over there, and wrote about them.  It's a lovely, personal work of art.</p>
<p>I'm envious.  I want to make something like that now.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>2 Feb 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Feb-07-2-feb-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/2-Feb-07-2-feb-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-02-02T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">2 Feb 07 - 2 Feb 07</p>
<p>I came across <a href="http://copywriterunderground.com/2007/02/01/how-to-negotiate-copywriting-fees-without-turning-into-an-asshole-a-nine-step-short-course/">How to Negotiate Copywriting Fees Without Turning Into an Asshole</a> while reading blogs this morning.  Besides being an excellent summary of a potentially tense aspect of business, it's wonderfully humane.  Most of its advice can be summed up by "be self-confident," but it has great specific suggestions.</p>
<p>Negotiations are not just about business board rooms, either.  Families and friends negotiate every day.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>30 Jan 07</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Jan-07-30-jan-07.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/30-Jan-07-30-jan-07.php</id>
    <updated>2007-01-30T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">30 Jan 07 - 30 Jan 07</p>
<img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0812968778.01.MZZZZZZZ.gif" alt="[IMAGE]" class="imageright" />
<p>Last night, I finished reading Boris Akunin's <em>The Winter Queen</em>.  I greatly enjoyed its rollicking mystery/adventure vibe and wry black comedy, until the last two pages.  The ending was bleak, dark, melancholy, and completely unexpected.</p>
<p>I still like the book, and want to read others in the series (<em>The Winter Queen</em> is the first).  But that ending wiped away about 80% of my goodwill.</p>
<p>A shame.  I wonder if the writer intended that reaction.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
   <title>Ryvius Zeta</title>
    <link href="http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/21-Jan-07-ryvius-zeta.php" />
    <id>http://brentnewhall.com/blogs/reviews/21-Jan-07-ryvius-zeta.php</id>
    <updated>2007-01-21T09:00:01Z</updated>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brentnewhall.com/">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">


<p class="blog_entry_title">21 Jan 07 - Ryvius Zeta</p>
<p>I felt a little sick today, so I skipped AWANA and watched some anime.</p>
<p>First, the fourth disc of <em>Infinite Ryvius</em>, a TV series about a bunch of teenage astronaut trainees who have to fend for themselves.  The plot's superficially similar to <em>Lord of the Flies</em>, but these characters are more mature.  It's less about savagery and more about the petty selfishness that quickly rises to the surface when immature people face crisis.</p>
<p>Then, <em>Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam: A New Translation III: Love is the Pulse of the Stars</em>.  It's the final film in a trilogy that re-tells one of the most depressing Gundam series.  The animation is improved and the tone is lightened to create a more powerful, less nihilistic story.  There's still a lot of death, but it's easier to take.</p>
<p class="blog_entry_footer">Posted in <a href="/blogs/reviews/">Reviews</a></p>

      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
